WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

676

With rising censorship, what we could use is a distributed information network. One that promotes information spread, and disrupts the news cycle. The media right now, combine with censorship, are our biggest problems. By creating an alternative distribution network we strike at the very heart of their ability to create and control narrative.

In short, we need something like Q, but outside their control, that lets us piggyback information onto as many networks and segments of society as possible.

Here me out, for those who have the stomach for it: Facebook, while censored a lot, is actually a good outlet for this task. Why? Because its strength is actually its weakness. It's such a large pool, they don't have enough live people to control the narrative intelligently. Likewise tiktok and instagram. Places like 4chan are upstream of breaking news, and culture, so allow the spreading of this idea, but are small enough that monitoring and disruption is near instantaneous.

In the same way trump was to Q, I recommend we create some anonymous figurehead tentatively linked to none other than Tucker Carlson.

Heres why: 1.The regime are thinking of running him as a placation candidate. 2. It'll be an unwelcome move on our part because we'll have control 3. Being a grifter climbing the ladder, his only options will be to endorse it, or remain silent which will fuel the speculation. I doubt he'll be able to resist. 4. As he rises, it'll empower the entire astroturf operation of ours. 5. As a consequence the regime will have to fight it to gain control, and damage his campaign as a result, or choose to leave us be which will help us spread. 6. Anything the regime does, will help us spread.

The tactic is actually pretty straight-forward. Q showed the way, unironically, to build information distribution networks on the backs of social movements

  1. pick a probable up and coming celebrity

  2. attach a movement to them by tentatively linking them to an anonymous figurehead.

  3. They're either opportunitistic and amplify, or they ignore it, and that can be used as fuel to spread speculation of the celebrity's ties to the figurehead.

  4. the fandom becomes the transmission network because they want to believe their candidate has foresight, is all-powerful, and is fighting for them. They want to believe their idol is special.

  5. The best part: The candidate can't dissuade the idea or connection without hurting their fandom and support in the process.

I propose we call the new figurehead "Z". Heres why: it will trick the bureaucrats into taking the cheapshot lazy route. "Z stands for russia! They even have it on their tanks!" This will give it the initial kickstart of public awareness it needs to get going. Just the right amount of reflexive hysteria from the neoliberal regime in the u.s.

With rising censorship, what we could use is a distributed information network. One that promotes information spread, and disrupts the news cycle. The media right now, combine with censorship, are our biggest problems. By creating an alternative distribution network we strike at the very heart of their ability to create and control narrative. In short, we need something like Q, but outside their control, that lets us piggyback information onto as many networks and segments of society as possible. Here me out, for those who have the stomach for it: Facebook, while censored a lot, is actually a good outlet for this task. Why? Because its strength is actually its weakness. It's such a large pool, they don't have enough live people to control the narrative intelligently. Likewise tiktok and instagram. Places like 4chan are upstream of breaking news, and culture, so allow the spreading of this idea, but are small enough that monitoring and disruption is near instantaneous. In the same way trump was to Q, I recommend we create some anonymous figurehead tentatively linked to none other than Tucker Carlson. Heres why: 1.The regime are thinking of running him as a placation candidate. 2. It'll be an unwelcome move on our part because we'll have control 3. Being a grifter climbing the ladder, his only options will be to endorse it, or remain silent which will fuel the speculation. I doubt he'll be able to resist. 4. As he rises, it'll empower the entire astroturf operation of ours. 5. As a consequence the regime will have to fight it to gain control, and damage his campaign as a result, or choose to leave us be which will help us spread. 6. Anything the regime does, will help us spread. The tactic is actually pretty straight-forward. Q showed the way, unironically, to build information distribution networks on the backs of social movements 1. pick a probable up and coming celebrity 2. attach a movement to them by tentatively linking them to an anonymous figurehead. 3. They're either opportunitistic and amplify, or they ignore it, and that can be used as fuel to spread speculation of the celebrity's ties to the figurehead. 4. the fandom becomes the transmission network because they *want* to believe their candidate has foresight, is all-powerful, and is fighting for them. They want to believe their idol is *special*. 5. The best part: The candidate can't dissuade the idea or connection without hurting their fandom and support in the process. I propose we call the new figurehead "Z". Heres why: it will trick the bureaucrats into taking the cheapshot lazy route. "Z stands for russia! They even have it on their tanks!" This will give it the initial kickstart of public awareness it needs to get going. Just the right amount of reflexive hysteria from the neoliberal regime in the u.s.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Google scans the whole Internet.

If you plant seeds, it "SEO"s your content and makes it harder to censor.

It also helps prevent "deboosting" algorithms.

Once your seeds are planted, by the time you make a hiugh effort post on 4chan, let's say, the issue will get tons of views, people will search, finding the relevant, scattered material, and the back and forth between links and information gets tied by machine learning in ways that most people don't really understand.

If your seeds get too much attention, at first, they get targeted by censorship.

It costs money to censor stuff. Upvotes, downvotes, comments, competing posts... that all. costs money.

So, if you post somewhere small and unknown, let is sit, for a bit, it evades a lot of the censorship that occurs if the issue is "hot."

When you make the issue "hot", it is now impossible to destroy the information by deleting your single post.