WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

761

With rising censorship, what we could use is a distributed information network. One that promotes information spread, and disrupts the news cycle. The media right now, combine with censorship, are our biggest problems. By creating an alternative distribution network we strike at the very heart of their ability to create and control narrative.

In short, we need something like Q, but outside their control, that lets us piggyback information onto as many networks and segments of society as possible.

Here me out, for those who have the stomach for it: Facebook, while censored a lot, is actually a good outlet for this task. Why? Because its strength is actually its weakness. It's such a large pool, they don't have enough live people to control the narrative intelligently. Likewise tiktok and instagram. Places like 4chan are upstream of breaking news, and culture, so allow the spreading of this idea, but are small enough that monitoring and disruption is near instantaneous.

In the same way trump was to Q, I recommend we create some anonymous figurehead tentatively linked to none other than Tucker Carlson.

Heres why: 1.The regime are thinking of running him as a placation candidate. 2. It'll be an unwelcome move on our part because we'll have control 3. Being a grifter climbing the ladder, his only options will be to endorse it, or remain silent which will fuel the speculation. I doubt he'll be able to resist. 4. As he rises, it'll empower the entire astroturf operation of ours. 5. As a consequence the regime will have to fight it to gain control, and damage his campaign as a result, or choose to leave us be which will help us spread. 6. Anything the regime does, will help us spread.

The tactic is actually pretty straight-forward. Q showed the way, unironically, to build information distribution networks on the backs of social movements

  1. pick a probable up and coming celebrity

  2. attach a movement to them by tentatively linking them to an anonymous figurehead.

  3. They're either opportunitistic and amplify, or they ignore it, and that can be used as fuel to spread speculation of the celebrity's ties to the figurehead.

  4. the fandom becomes the transmission network because they want to believe their candidate has foresight, is all-powerful, and is fighting for them. They want to believe their idol is special.

  5. The best part: The candidate can't dissuade the idea or connection without hurting their fandom and support in the process.

I propose we call the new figurehead "Z". Heres why: it will trick the bureaucrats into taking the cheapshot lazy route. "Z stands for russia! They even have it on their tanks!" This will give it the initial kickstart of public awareness it needs to get going. Just the right amount of reflexive hysteria from the neoliberal regime in the u.s.

With rising censorship, what we could use is a distributed information network. One that promotes information spread, and disrupts the news cycle. The media right now, combine with censorship, are our biggest problems. By creating an alternative distribution network we strike at the very heart of their ability to create and control narrative. In short, we need something like Q, but outside their control, that lets us piggyback information onto as many networks and segments of society as possible. Here me out, for those who have the stomach for it: Facebook, while censored a lot, is actually a good outlet for this task. Why? Because its strength is actually its weakness. It's such a large pool, they don't have enough live people to control the narrative intelligently. Likewise tiktok and instagram. Places like 4chan are upstream of breaking news, and culture, so allow the spreading of this idea, but are small enough that monitoring and disruption is near instantaneous. In the same way trump was to Q, I recommend we create some anonymous figurehead tentatively linked to none other than Tucker Carlson. Heres why: 1.The regime are thinking of running him as a placation candidate. 2. It'll be an unwelcome move on our part because we'll have control 3. Being a grifter climbing the ladder, his only options will be to endorse it, or remain silent which will fuel the speculation. I doubt he'll be able to resist. 4. As he rises, it'll empower the entire astroturf operation of ours. 5. As a consequence the regime will have to fight it to gain control, and damage his campaign as a result, or choose to leave us be which will help us spread. 6. Anything the regime does, will help us spread. The tactic is actually pretty straight-forward. Q showed the way, unironically, to build information distribution networks on the backs of social movements 1. pick a probable up and coming celebrity 2. attach a movement to them by tentatively linking them to an anonymous figurehead. 3. They're either opportunitistic and amplify, or they ignore it, and that can be used as fuel to spread speculation of the celebrity's ties to the figurehead. 4. the fandom becomes the transmission network because they *want* to believe their candidate has foresight, is all-powerful, and is fighting for them. They want to believe their idol is *special*. 5. The best part: The candidate can't dissuade the idea or connection without hurting their fandom and support in the process. I propose we call the new figurehead "Z". Heres why: it will trick the bureaucrats into taking the cheapshot lazy route. "Z stands for russia! They even have it on their tanks!" This will give it the initial kickstart of public awareness it needs to get going. Just the right amount of reflexive hysteria from the neoliberal regime in the u.s.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

It's easier than all that.

https://pic8.co/sh/Oodu5s.png

https://pic8.co/sh/4eIWRW.png

https://pic8.co/sh/ATxow6.png

Poal and Pic8 are great tools for doing what you're talking about.

I will tell you about my experience, as I've done a lot of what you're describing.

When an important issue comes to light, you have to ride the wave, so to speak, of Internet astroturfing movements, where groups that are paying for likes, upvotes, reposts, etc, will pick up your material. Free "boosting." Piggybacking on the boosting apparatus is what you're describing.

For years, I was frustrated about how anything insightful about corruption that I shared was completely shat upon. It wasn't until about 2015 that I realized how artificial the hate was and it's only become worse, since.

Step 1: Create multiple accounts on multiple platforms.

Step 2: Make two types of posts on each item. One uses important key words, so others can find them. One is oblique to avoid immediate censorship. You do not want either of these posts to become popular. Make your own subreddit, blog, Facebook Group... whatever. It doesn't need any followers. You need your material to exist in a variety of forums prior to making it popular. What you want is "saturation" but you need to seed it, first.

Step 3: Make a targeted post at the largest audience possible. Link to the other material, but don't make the linked React to the response, appropriately.

Step 4: Rinse and Repeat.

I'll give you an example:

When I started the web of slime for pizzagate, I made a huge network of online profiles on many sites and probed and tested what I was and wasn't allowed to get away with. As I started to gain traction, a set of bad actors showed up and played all kinds of tricks, and, ultimately, Q was born where the Q movement absolutely shat on my research... for years. They threatened me, doxxed me, etc. This is, of course, the David Seaman, Brendan O'Connell, Pamphlet Anon crew. I wasn't alone. They started by being psychos to Jerome Corsi, who was an actual insider.

The Qtards would regularly take my research or research from other people and act like it was some amazing inside information. The Q tards on Voat made sure that only the Q spin was allowed on important topics. William Hanley, Suzanne Ayson... and those other psychos... did everything they could to stop me... on top of what the liberal shills were already doing. I was beset upon from all sides.

Their attacks were pretty effective, so I started showing red flags for them to come after, while I used other accounts and more subdued material to gain a foothold in the direction I thought was appropriate. Mainly, I wanted to teach people how to do their own leaks, since Wikileaks, imo, was compromised af. Ultimately, the Q Tards won, in that the operation was designed to bring everyone out to Jan 6 to be labeled a traitor by traitors. Q disappeared just in time to prevent Hunter Biden data to be leaked.

Even now, the Q tards are avoiding the topic, even though there is fresh data that no one is reporting on and it is the perfect opportunity to seize the narrative.

I had my hands tied for a bit, because I drew too much attention for myself. But, I reached a stalemate, which allowed me to start at it, again.

The new example:

For two years, the Hunter Biden material has been completely suppressed. Despite being, yet another, smoking gun for Democrat corruption, even on Poal it doesn't really get upvoted unless it's a funny meme.

As usual, I started multiple small niches to expose the story and release the data in a way normies can understand.

I started /r/HunterBidenForPrison, then made a web scraping bot to make sure every article and tidbit was caught and posted for review.

I, then, wrote a couple of pieces, here and there, to gauge the response.

Once I had time to get my head around the shill response, I posted to a larger community and immediately shared my link with all of the corners of the Internet that were friendly to the topic.

https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/vz54yz/the_hunter_biden_saga_continues/

This allowed exposure to real people so that the responses could get ahead of the shill response, which, on /r/conspiracy, is to start by suppressing the post with downvotes to keep it off of "hot." Even though I was suspended, and the post was shadowbanned, the linking to other communities drove it to the top.

https://pic8.co/sh/7UmtGc.jpg

I also hit other websites with slightly different approaches. 4chan is about the shittiest platform their is to post on... the interface and usability is absolute crap. But... when trying to reach an audience, it serves it's purpose.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/387108055/#387108055

I also sent these types of presentations to nearly every major news outlet.

This was enough of a break through to force the news to capitulate, as a sufficient amount of original information could no longer be denied.

I don't know if it's true, but I'm hearing that a resignation is in the works as a result of this latest push on Hunter Biden data. Keep in mind, it took two years to make this kind of progress.

And, I have to follow the mob's interest, because in April of 2020, the same methods used on Hunter Biden's accounts was also used on the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the WHO, the NIH, etc. There is a massive amount of leaked information that every news outlet is still sitting on.

There are many bombshells still waiting to be presented. If the same OSINT techniques are applied to Jim Biden, the Biden corruption saga expands in a wild way.

But yeah... point being is that it ain't easy to piggyback, but it is possible if you lay the right foundation. The key ingredient is usually original information combined with funny memes, posted in as many places as possible.

[–] 0 pt

Step 1: Create multiple accounts on multiple platforms.

You've laid out a clear path forward in terms of how to spread information. Thank you!

Step 3: Make a targeted post at the largest audience possible. Link to the other material, but don't make the linked React to the response, appropriately.

Could you clarify. I think this went over my head a bit.

[–] 1 pt

Google scans the whole Internet.

If you plant seeds, it "SEO"s your content and makes it harder to censor.

It also helps prevent "deboosting" algorithms.

Once your seeds are planted, by the time you make a hiugh effort post on 4chan, let's say, the issue will get tons of views, people will search, finding the relevant, scattered material, and the back and forth between links and information gets tied by machine learning in ways that most people don't really understand.

If your seeds get too much attention, at first, they get targeted by censorship.

It costs money to censor stuff. Upvotes, downvotes, comments, competing posts... that all. costs money.

So, if you post somewhere small and unknown, let is sit, for a bit, it evades a lot of the censorship that occurs if the issue is "hot."

When you make the issue "hot", it is now impossible to destroy the information by deleting your single post.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Want some action? Let's see if we can get some traction with the "all politicians are on the same side" meme going around twatter. Essentially it goes like this:

You take all Republicans and Dems and their newsfags (Tucker et. al) and say they are on the same side as Biden and Hunter and Hillary. With enough traction they will be FORCED to fight back.

When they do we never relent until the last politician is strangled with the intestines of the last news anchor....