WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

682

An argument in support of eugenics.

If we look at the strategic situation of the u.s. today, a problem begins to emerge. As the u.s. fades, and struggles to keep up with competitors, such as asia, eventually we risk being eclipsed. One solution is mass-industrialization, and this I believe is the route u.s. powers are taking. Historic parallels exist, such as the forced industrialization of asia and sovietization. We can therefore look at communism in a new light: an arms-race between major powers for closed-system economic verticalization.

Americans today suffer from a schism. Much as the bolsheviks divided their people into the haves and have nots, in order to weaponize the latter--so too america is divided. The cities stand as bulwarks of future plans, a sort of inevitability. Both a threat and a promise of things to come for everyone who live outside the cities. The divide is rural vs urban, and this analysis allows us to see that the ultimate side which suburbanites will take, is also urban, because the comforts and infrastructure are controlled by cities. Proximity predicts preference, just as cain killed abel, and new systems consume old.

The crux of all of this is demographics. In asia, they survive, on the theft and tacit scientific sharing between east and west. In the cities they survive by the tacit cooperation of rural with urban parts of the u.s. and europe. The model is to crush dissent. The model has always been to crush dissent--The pro-life movement has shown this definitively, e.g. the violent response from both secret police and quasi-militant spiteful mutants in the street. In the face of this, the international right (traditionalists) and national right (nationalists) have retreated to 'infowar' campaigns, which while effective, have amounted to a holding pattern. The regime will eventually break such a blockade by new and ever increasing censorship powers and ever increasing treacheries by the junior wing of the uniparty. "A new age of cooperation and civic nationalism appears" where some freedoms become absolute privileges, and some topics truly become 'verboten', red flags, and are smashed into silence at every single turn. Infowars and memes will fail.

As mentioned, the pro-life movement on the otherhand, has demonstrated that every successful movement has a visible, frequent, and energetic public component. In this the cities present the ultimate problem. For as we become more public, ideologically, the amount , organization , and methods of violence against our aims, will grow enormously. The engine of these will be the secret police (fbi, atf, dhs, nsa, cdc, etc), the NGOs (adl etc), and the street enforcers (antifa, blm). The escalation of such can already be seen in janes revenge, which has not only committed wide-scale arson, but have publicly called for large scale murder of their opponents.

These two ethnic elements present the ultimate problem looking for a solution:

  1. secret police largely manned by secularists-descendants of mormonist, irish-catholic, and pro-israeli families in america and their pro-zionist british-controlled allies on wallstreet.

  2. violent extremists at the street level, again secularists, mixed-race marxists, blacks radicals, and non-orthodox jewish-descendant university bums ("professors" et al) of middle class or upperclass politaratii families that make their careers from working for the administrative state.

The first is effectively neutered without the second. The second pervades all aspects of society, from the local, to the national, from tech companies, to wallstreet, from civil administration and unions, to the heads of major departments in national governments across the west. The overwhelming number of them though are rarely more than ramblers on the street, organizing, dolling out cash from the NGOs, running struggle-session recruitments, tossing molatovs, or attacking pedestrians. In a civil war these would be the bum-rush zerg army of bolshevist stooges wielding cia-lent shitty AKs while barricading streets and the odd building they seized rather than burned. They are the irredeemables, and the main threat when it comes to their numbers. And without the threat of tacitly unleashing them (as they did during the floyd riots, and are winding up to do now), the regime loses its ability to threaten the political and economic base of the junior wing of the uniparty into compliance.

As time goes on, the u.s, to maintain control, and answer the question "what to do with the cities", will resort to two simultaneous solutions: the reduction of the population in the cities, and mass forced-industrialization, using the remainder of the cities, and weaponizing them against the rural and suburban population.

As a nation we will miss a 'strategic beat' against asia and other major powers, likely permanently giving up our 'seat' as a major power, or splintering, while also losing the protection of the constitution or recognition of common liberties, in the face of a wave of "national emergencies" and the need to "adapt as a nation to the new era of industrial warfare."

The cities therefore, are the crux of the problem. A eugenic problem.

And because of this, whoever answers that problem, will go on to decide the fate of America, and thus the west.

The default answer boils down to totalitarianism, to anti-christian, pro-atheist, anti-white (anti-european), and anti-traditional, and anti-nationalist opinion.

We will be scapegoated, and wiped out if things are allowed to play out as they have been. This must be a foregone conclusion for anyone who has truly looked at america's current direction.

First, this incipient demographic divide will be inflamed. Then, having driven the divide to the breaking, a false civic nationalism will be pursued. This will for a brief golden year or three, be a sort of american revival. After that a new collapse, a new horror, as america turns violently and vehemently against itself, against the european base, the christian base, the traditionalists, and the nationalist origins (the constitution, western law, etc).

After which, by lockstep, ratchet-like effect, the persecution and demonization will take on a new, nation-wide fervor. At the same time a new hope will emerge, designed to keep this same scapegoat, pacified, a continued low-level pushback, a new plan to trust, a new champion once a year, once a season, once a month, once a week even--a revolving circus of new ringmasters saying all the right words, seemingly doing all the right things. Much adieu about nothing will eventually become their motto and watchword.

And then comes a war, a war which we will lose, both against us internally, and against asia internationally.

ANOTHER PATH

However, there is another path.

America and the west sits at a great crossroads: A choice between its founding traditions, and the people who established them, and all those who came after, who seek, like locusts, like cancer, like parasites and termites, to undermine and destroy it all.

The question is "what to do with the cities?"

And the answer is to do away with them , just as they wish to do away with us.

We need not strike the first blow, only understand that the neoliberal cities will strike the first blow against us . We need only be prepared, as a culture, to defend, and push against them as they do. To have the movement in place, the ideology in place, to organize both the manpower and resources to respond to their mass violence, so that they may not drive us from the cities, drive us from the suburbs, or from the country, as they tried to do in the summers of 2020 and 2021.

Riots, which could have easily morphed into color revolutions (and almost did), courtesy of the secret police and NGOs, can no longer go unanswered. Assaults, mass arson, and the organized street mobs that commit them en mass, can no longer be allowed to operate safely and openly in the public.

It has become clear to me that these people are congenitally defected, the cast offs of killing millions of good americans and westernerss in ww1 and ww2 and beyond. And they have become a danger not merely to america, but civilization.

What they seek is none other than the destruction of the productive , of the healthy , in preference to parasitism. To bolshevism. To nany-statism. A total destruction of healthy families, and traditions that promote healthy citizens and nations. They champion disease, homosexuality, infertility, and obesity at every turn. They promote a court system that destroys families, trafficks in children, teachs kids to mutilate themselves with surgery and chemicals, teaches men to be women, and women to be men, and they call this healthy and patriotic. They are a dysgenic scourge.

Eugenics is an ugly word, made ugly by these very people.

The truth though it is TIME for eugenics. It is time we ask "what is to be done with the cities?", what is to be done with the dysgenic hordes of ingrates destroying our very foundations and contaminating the rest of us with their polluted ideas, and corrupt blood--a mass of people only producing more of them ?

It is a problem that is festering, and will only continue to grow, if left alone to its own devices, till it comes for us.

And the answer is Eugenics .

We will not start the war. Ethics and humanity demand we don't.

But when they come for us, when they call us "MAGAts", when they call us defectives, when they call for us to be culled, and they start a eugenic war against us.

We must be prepared to respond in kind.

Remain peaceful. Start no "brushfires of liberty". But wherever the mob appears. Wherever they commit arson. Wherever their bureaucrats attempt to destroy a business, or a church, be prepared to defend yourselves.

They intend to start a Eugenic War, unaware they are the very dysgenic mob causing all the problems.

Your response will determine the answer in the history books.

Your response will decide the future, and who will continue to exist to carry on the legacy of mankind.

↓ expand content
An argument in support of eugenics. If we look at the strategic situation of the u.s. today, a problem begins to emerge. As the u.s. fades, and struggles to keep up with competitors, such as asia, eventually we risk being eclipsed. One solution is mass-industrialization, and this I believe is the route u.s. powers are taking. Historic parallels exist, such as the forced industrialization of asia and sovietization. We can therefore look at communism in a new light: an arms-race between major powers for closed-system economic verticalization. Americans today suffer from a schism. Much as the bolsheviks divided their people into the haves and have nots, in order to weaponize the latter--so too america is divided. The cities stand as bulwarks of future plans, a sort of inevitability. Both a threat and a promise of things to come for everyone who live outside the cities. The divide is rural vs urban, and this analysis allows us to see that the ultimate side which suburbanites will take, is also urban, because the comforts and infrastructure are controlled by cities. Proximity predicts preference, just as cain killed abel, and new systems consume old. The crux of all of this is demographics. In asia, they survive, on the theft and tacit scientific sharing between east and west. In the cities they survive by the tacit cooperation of rural with urban parts of the u.s. and europe. The model is to crush dissent. The model has *always* been to crush dissent--The pro-life movement has shown this definitively, e.g. the violent response from both secret police and quasi-militant spiteful mutants in the street. In the face of this, the international right (traditionalists) and national right (nationalists) have retreated to 'infowar' campaigns, which while effective, have amounted to a holding pattern. The regime will eventually break such a blockade by new and ever increasing censorship powers and ever increasing treacheries by the junior wing of the uniparty. "A new age of cooperation and civic nationalism appears" where some freedoms become absolute privileges, and some topics truly become 'verboten', red flags, and are smashed into silence at every single turn. Infowars and memes will fail. As mentioned, the pro-life movement on the otherhand, has demonstrated that every successful movement has a visible, frequent, and energetic public component. In this the cities present the ultimate problem. For as we become more public, ideologically, the *amount*, *organization*, and *methods* of violence against our aims, will grow enormously. The engine of these will be the secret police (fbi, atf, dhs, nsa, cdc, etc), the NGOs (adl etc), and the street enforcers (antifa, blm). The escalation of such can already be seen in janes revenge, which has not only committed wide-scale arson, but have publicly called for large scale murder of their opponents. These two ethnic elements present the ultimate problem looking for a solution: 1. secret police largely manned by secularists-descendants of mormonist, irish-catholic, and pro-israeli families in america and their pro-zionist british-controlled allies on wallstreet. 2. violent extremists at the street level, again secularists, mixed-race marxists, blacks radicals, and non-orthodox jewish-descendant university bums ("professors" et al) of middle class or upperclass politaratii families that make their careers from working for the administrative state. The first is effectively neutered without the second. The second pervades all aspects of society, from the local, to the national, from tech companies, to wallstreet, from civil administration and unions, to the heads of major departments in national governments across the west. The overwhelming number of them though are rarely more than ramblers on the street, organizing, dolling out cash from the NGOs, running struggle-session recruitments, tossing molatovs, or attacking pedestrians. In a civil war these would be the bum-rush zerg army of bolshevist stooges wielding cia-lent shitty AKs while barricading streets and the odd building they seized rather than burned. They are the irredeemables, and the main threat when it comes to their numbers. And without the threat of tacitly unleashing them (as they did during the floyd riots, and are winding up to do now), the regime loses its ability to threaten the *political and economic base* of the junior wing of the uniparty into compliance. As time goes on, the u.s, to maintain control, and answer the question "what to do with the cities", will resort to two simultaneous solutions: the reduction of the population in the cities, and mass forced-industrialization, using the remainder of the cities, and weaponizing them against the rural and suburban population. As a nation we will miss a 'strategic beat' against asia and other major powers, likely permanently giving up our 'seat' as a major power, or splintering, while also losing the protection of the constitution or *recognition* of common liberties, in the face of a wave of "national emergencies" and the need to "adapt as a nation to the new era of industrial warfare." The cities therefore, are the crux of the problem. A eugenic problem. And because of this, whoever *answers* that problem, will go on to decide the fate of America, and thus the west. The default answer boils down to totalitarianism, to anti-christian, pro-atheist, anti-white (anti-european), and anti-traditional, and anti-nationalist opinion. We will be scapegoated, and wiped out if things are allowed to play out as they have been. This must be a foregone conclusion for anyone who has truly looked at america's current direction. First, this incipient demographic divide will be inflamed. Then, having driven the divide to the breaking, a false civic nationalism will be pursued. This will for a brief golden year or three, be a sort of american revival. After that a new collapse, a new horror, as america turns violently and vehemently against itself, against the european base, the christian base, the traditionalists, and the nationalist origins (the constitution, western law, etc). After which, by lockstep, ratchet-like effect, the persecution and demonization will take on a new, nation-wide fervor. At the same time a new hope will emerge, designed to keep this same scapegoat, pacified, a continued low-level pushback, a new plan to trust, a new champion once a year, once a season, once a month, once a week even--a revolving circus of new ringmasters saying all the right words, seemingly doing all the right things. Much adieu about nothing will eventually become their motto and watchword. And then comes a war, a war which we will lose, both against us internally, and against asia internationally. ANOTHER PATH However, there is another path. America and the west sits at a great crossroads: A choice between its founding traditions, and the people who established them, and all those who came after, who seek, like locusts, like cancer, like parasites and termites, to undermine and destroy it all. The question is "what to do with the cities?" And the answer is to *do away with them*, just as they wish to do away with us. We need not strike the first blow, only understand that the neoliberal cities *will* strike the first blow against *us*. We need only be prepared, as a culture, to defend, and push against them as they do. To have the movement in place, the ideology in place, to organize both the manpower and resources to respond to their mass violence, so that they may not drive us from the cities, drive us from the suburbs, or from the country, as they tried to do in the summers of 2020 and 2021. Riots, which could have easily morphed into color revolutions (and almost did), courtesy of the secret police and NGOs, can no longer go unanswered. Assaults, mass arson, and the organized street mobs that commit them en mass, can no longer be allowed to operate safely and openly in the public. It has become clear to me that these people are congenitally defected, the cast offs of killing millions of good americans and westernerss in ww1 and ww2 and beyond. And they have become a danger not merely to america, but civilization. What they seek is none other than the destruction of *the productive*, of the *healthy*, in preference to parasitism. To bolshevism. To nany-statism. A total destruction of healthy families, and traditions that promote healthy citizens and nations. They champion disease, homosexuality, infertility, and obesity at every turn. They promote a court system that destroys families, trafficks in children, teachs kids to mutilate themselves with surgery and chemicals, teaches men to be women, and women to be men, and they call this healthy and patriotic. They are a dysgenic scourge. Eugenics is an ugly word, made ugly by these very people. The truth though it is TIME for eugenics. It is time we ask "what is to be done with the cities?", what is to be done with the dysgenic hordes of ingrates destroying our very foundations and contaminating the rest of us with their polluted ideas, and corrupt blood--a mass of people only producing more of *them*? It is a problem that is festering, and will only continue to grow, if left alone to its own devices, till it comes for us. And the answer is *Eugenics*. We will not start the war. Ethics and humanity demand we don't. But when they come for us, when they call us "MAGAts", when they call us defectives, when they call for us to be culled, and they start a eugenic war against us. We must be prepared to respond in kind. Remain peaceful. Start no "brushfires of liberty". But wherever the mob appears. Wherever they commit arson. Wherever their bureaucrats attempt to destroy a business, or a church, be prepared to defend yourselves. They intend to start a Eugenic War, unaware they are the very dysgenic mob causing all the problems. Your response will determine the answer in the history books. Your response will decide the future, and who will continue to exist to carry on the legacy of mankind.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts 2y

as far as I understand Eugenetics means "there is somebody that decides if you live or die"

no, no good, I am against it, I am for NATURAL selection, what does it mean ?

it means NO MORE protection of stupidity

no more mandatory seat belt, no more mandatory vaccines, no more safety laws, firearms for all

it is going to be painful ? yes, but I rather battle for my survival than be killed by an idiotic doctor

[–] 0 pt 2y

it means NO MORE protection of stupidity

no more mandatory seat belt, no more mandatory vaccines, no more safety laws, firearms for all

And no more welfare for niggers. Let them pull their own weight, as they did before the 1960s.

[–] 0 pt 2y (edited 2y)

as far as I understand Eugenetics means "there is somebody that decides if you live or die"

I'm saying the mob and the regime that supports them, is going to attempt to do this anyway. They are winding up for it. Go search for "stages of genocide."

And I'm saying that as they wind up and then begin to commit this campaign, we should be prepared to respond defensively, as a society and demographic, in kind.

The individualism argument is defensive, and we've seen 200 years of losses because of it. I'm arguing not to start the war, but being prepared to win it when they start it. And to win it on the very same basis they start it on.

A "tit for tat" strategy, socially, politically, economically, and and in every other aspect.

[–] 3 pts 2y (edited 2y)

What they seek is none other than the destruction of the productive, of the healthy, in preference to parasitism. To bolshevism. To nany-statism. A total destruction of healthy families, and traditions that promote healthy citizens and nations. They champion disease, homosexuality, infertility, and obesity at every turn. They promote a court system that destroys families, trafficks in children, teachs kids to mutilate themselves with surgery and chemicals, teaches men to be women, and women to be men, and they call this healthy and patriotic. They are a dysgenic scourge.

Well thought out and written. Eugenics will be the natural outcome. Already most people I've met lately have moved or are planning to move to a conservative area. The corrupt reeling in degeneracy cities will die off and there will be widespread rioting to hurry it along. The fight comes when their food is gone.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts 2y (edited 2y)

We dont have to do a thing but prepare and wait for that event. The cities fucking suck, the services are garbage and falling apart, the regulations are garbage and ensure that no growth can occur there, the people are garbage and mostly useless, the industry left for foreign shores and isn't coming back to the cities because nothing can be accomplished in them. Late stage service economy everyone is trapped and starving to death under the regulation and collapsing infrastructure bubble that only worked during the industrialized growth phase. The cities lost the subsidies that were blowing them into bubbles.

[–] 1 pt 2y

You know all the modern zombie movies? Not where some Haitian turns blacks into zombies, but where some infectious agent creates "the living dead"? People slowly walking around, glassy-eyed, until they get glose to you and try to eat you?

This fear is rooted in human psychology and human history. This is what happens with cities when society collapses and they're no longer brought food. People hunker down until there's absolutely nothing left and then they start wandering. The drones, starving and low-energy, start looking for anything that they can survive on. They'll steal what you have, and if you're not careful and not lucky, you may wind up on the dinner plate yourself.

[+] [deleted] 1 pt 2y
[–] 1 pt 2y

The Eugenics has already begun. All countries are experiencing a remarkable drop in live births this year. Keep in mind, that most western women only consider pregnancy between the ages of 25 to 35. This drop in fertility will be compounded with each coming year as more women discover they are unable to bring a child to term and more men discover their sperm counts to be too low. Couple this with their previous push for HPV vaccines that were positively correlated with lower fertility in women, the increased cost of living, lack of housing, and debt load and the result is a population collapse that can only be offset by immigration. Western nations, specifically western cities, are like roach motels; they offer high appeal but result in death yet the roaches still come.

The answer lies in a return to local communities. Small, personal communities founded upon like minded principles. Neighbours who can care for one another, keep each other respectful and allow for a high-trust society to thrive. Individualism is not the answer. We are weak and vulnerable alone. Do not trust men without families; they are likely to be sent to deceive and have no strong vested interest in the future beyond their own desires.