Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

959

Think about the "Disinforation Governance Board"

Bunch of people have claimed it's "illegal" or "unconstitutional".

To take this to court, one must define, in legal terms, what "disinformation" actually means.

It's a term without legal definition nor legal precedent. Making it a tough court case to win.

The power of newspeak.

Think about the "Disinforation Governance Board" Bunch of people have claimed it's "illegal" or "unconstitutional". To take this to court, one must define, in legal terms, what "disinformation" actually means. It's a term without legal definition nor legal precedent. Making it a tough court case to win. The power of newspeak.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (6).
[–] • 0 pt 2y

with them saying the government should be allowed to edit speech i mean how is that even slightly non government? twitter would legally defacto become a platform and then the government in theory should not be able to edit the tweets