Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

Think about the "Disinforation Governance Board"

Bunch of people have claimed it's "illegal" or "unconstitutional".

To take this to court, one must define, in legal terms, what "disinformation" actually means.

It's a term without legal definition nor legal precedent. Making it a tough court case to win.

The power of newspeak.

Think about the "Disinforation Governance Board" Bunch of people have claimed it's "illegal" or "unconstitutional". To take this to court, one must define, in legal terms, what "disinformation" actually means. It's a term without legal definition nor legal precedent. Making it a tough court case to win. The power of newspeak.

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt 2y

It's also the same reason why it will be relatively powerless. No legal definition. No means of prosecution. It'll probably wind up being a bunch of bureaucrats kvetching on the internet about information they don't want getting out. If they end up with any influence at all, it'll be because we gave it to them.

[–] • 0 pt 2y (edited 2y)

If they end up with any influence at all, it'll be because we gave it to them.

they have an organized military and police force, you don't.

they have a system of false parties, which only represent them, you don't.

they have the illusion of choice with a voting system rigged to give pre-determined outcomes, you don't.

remind me, what influence have we 'gave' them?

They are an illegitimate, illegal, and unlawful occupation. They're not even a government. They're a criminal conspiracy.

We gave them nothing. They took it.

They, the regime, continue to keep it by the sheer mercy of American patience . They are allowed to continue to exist simply because Americans refuse to show up--because mercy and patience endure.

[–] • 0 pt 2y

with them saying the government should be allowed to edit speech i mean how is that even slightly non government? twitter would legally defacto become a platform and then the government in theory should not be able to edit the tweets

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt 2y

It just means the ministry of truth will use extrajudicial means to punish the political opponents of the democrat party. Think of 'disinformation' as violating 'community guidelines'. They'll just make shit up on the spot to attack people they don't like. They'll put pressure on your ISP, your bank, your credit card companies to deplatform you, and will do the same to companies who don't comply with their demands. Basically what they've already been doing, but on a larger scale.

[–] • 0 pt 2y

Same with Jew - a race, a religion, a nationality (in practice)

[–] • 0 pt 2y

If I remember Jews are the land of Essau, curse, and even now, their origins are that of a rat orgy that got vommited on by a gay man with Diarrhea, getting run train on by his Uncle