In the following [ZH article](https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/deflation-next-will-bullwhip-do-feds-job-inflation) the author writes: >>Earlier this year, consumers pulled back… at first just slightly. But all of those products kept pouring in, along with buffer stock. Warehouse inventories piled up. And now consumers have shifted away from consuming physical products and have started to consume services and experiences once again. Meanwhile, all of that inventory keeps coming. If this is true, then the regime will likely go with the same playbook as before: doubling down. They can't let the great reset and the pivot of globalism to other major powers, falter. Whatever the crisis is, it will have the effect of, or at least attempt to, 1. lock us down again 2. drive consumer spending away from services and experiences into hard goods. The service economy runs on network infrastructure, so this would therefore make sense of more than a year of doomsaying about a "cyberpandemic". Which would also stimulate spending on durable goods and physical products. This makes less sense if we simply see a resurgence of covid by itself. Following a double-crisis of a cyberpandemic, not to be confused with a total network takedown (more like a highly unreliable network, 'rationed' out and balkanized regionally), I predict more control measures, more emergency powers invoked, and new money printing (stimulus). It would appear we are not yet through the sub-hyperinflationary cycle (in the "hyperinflation -> deflation" fraud being committed by wallstreet and the fed). The brief opening up and "covid going away" appears to have been a reprieve to contain the public outrage over lockdown measures--and also a period of demand destruction, *or* manufacturing demand destruction for whats left of the retail sector. If I'm right then the rightwing of the uniparty will be installed, to have the subsequent inventory shortages and sticker shock blamed on them, to divert attention from the inner party (left wing), while new restrictions are put in place. To soften the blow to the stability of their political control, they'll money print to then *stimulate* demand again. If that fails, they will go to war, to consume the excess instead of going through deflation, and potentially making u.s. exports too expensive for our trading partners (which with questions about u.s. dollar value, and the swift system, might be a death blow). It's a seesaw of tightly controlled increases and decreases in inflation, deflation, production, and demand. The regime is walking a tightrope.