I agree that moderates don't like what's happening, but they simply do not understand that it is the middle ground or compromise itself that keeps the Hegelian dialectic spiral going
It's more important to keep them from choosing a side, than winning them over.
Big Tent strategy of the regime fails if the moderates decide to stay out of it.
And then it comes down to which side is more capable.
The middle ground of compromise is the marxist's side. And unless we suddenly gain control of mass media, the middle with its unmoored positions will always trend left.
The middle ground of compromise is the marxist's side.
No, thats your argument, that the middle always compromises, while the wild swings in political sentiment in the u.s. contradicts the very suggestion.
Compromise is to choose a side.
I'm talking about ambivalence and hesistation-to-give-aid/participate because of hyperpolarization.
Which is why I support accelerationism.
The more people tune out, the more the left will overreach and alienate people before it has a chance to appeal to them.
while the wild swings in political sentiment in the u.s. contradicts the very suggestion.
What wild swings? We have trended hard left on almost everything for decades. The "wild swings" are just moderates blustering and then re-electing ZOG Team Red who will always pretend they must compromise with ZOG Team Blue over contrived issues, meanwhile the dialectic marches ever onward. When both options of a "compromise" include moving further from your original position, you are losing. That is what moderates have been trained to do.
I agree that accelerationism is a preferable solution.
(post is archived)