Go back to ww2. The blitzkreig failed because it over extended and left its logistics vulnerable. Remind me again, what is happening in russia? By attacking from the sides of the main thrust, and giving headway TO the germans, u.s. and allied forces neutralized the german tactic. The russian advance *isn't* blitzkreig, not directly, which is why analysts didn't spot it. The guerilla offensive hitting it head-on was stupid, and basically *converted* the russian offensive *into* a type of blitz, due to force-disparity and owing to the russian's momentum. They're probably attributing their successes to their recent pivot to combine arms and don't realize this is the actual explanation. The way to win is for the guerillas/u.s. proxies to actually abandon what they're holding *and draw russian forces out*, ahead of logistics. To keep baiting them into this until it works. Russians will be forced to hold, and lose momentum, advance and die, or retreat and lose. Sort of like how u.s. propaganda *bluffed* that it was trying to bleed russia. Only, they have to follow *through* this time for it to work. The key thing is to accelerate attrition. To up the ante on their side, without over-committing on the u.s. end. Russia can't afford to *hold* those cities. Thats the problem. But the problem is *masked* because they're currently engaged in active fighting. A competent invader in war time is rarely an effective governor in peacetime. Peace is expensive. First beat the russian blitz by yielding into it so it makes itself vulnerable. Then yield the city and watch the russian victory narrative falter. Nice to see disney and its agenda get screwed btw. I'm going to bed.