WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Discussed the possibility before, that hiroshima and nagasaki were actually firebombings and not nuclear bombings. Not here to go into that, except to say, what if nuclear weapons aren't real? Would explain why the orion project was cancelled eventually.

Also would explain why iran hasn't managed to make them, despite billions poured into the project .

Makes me wonder why they don't cheap out and salt regular missiles with radioactive materiel.

Hundreds of times cheaper, and just as threatening as the real-deal.

Discussed the possibility before, that hiroshima and nagasaki were actually firebombings and not nuclear bombings. Not here to go into that, except to say, what if nuclear weapons aren't real? Would explain why the orion project was cancelled eventually. Also would explain *why iran hasn't managed to make them, despite billions poured into the project*. Makes me wonder why they don't cheap out and salt regular missiles with radioactive materiel. Hundreds of times cheaper, and just as threatening as the real-deal.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt 3y

what if nuclear weapons aren't real?

The Cesium-137, Cobalt-60 and Strontium-90 (and other radionuclides) that contaminate the above ground test sites would like to have a word with you.

[–] 0 pt 3y

The Cesium-137, Cobalt-60 and Strontium-90 (and other radionuclides) that contaminate the above ground test sites would like to have a word with you.

For sure, but are you certain those are only produced in nuclear explosions?

How certain are you? And who told you these facts?