This 'convoy' is for show and it will never work because MSM will make them the 'criminal'. The Drivers Could and should really destroy this liberal/communist Coup by refusing to deliver FOOD and fuel to ANY liberal/communist city (NY, LA, DC, SF, Chicago). In a WEEK the liberal sheep would RIOT against their own 'leaders' and MSM.
"This 'convoy' is for show and it will never work because MSM will make them the 'criminal'. "
Is a variation of "don't do or say anything! Thats what they want! They want a reaction!"
Coup by refusing to deliver FOOD and fuel to ANY liberal/communist city
Nope, because individually, they can come seize the trucks anyway. Individually we're not a nuisance thats sufficiently visible to damage the state when the state tries to shut it down. And the streets aren't clogged with vehicles if they go the individual route. Which means they can just bring in afghans, somalis, and other illegals to drive those trucks and deliver, without interference.
Convoys work to cause economic damage effectively, because of the confluence of secondary problems they create for the regime.
Any solution that leaves the state any alternative except 1. bargaining, or 2. violence against us, is not a solution.
The regime has to be forced into that specific dilemma, because its a choice: answer grievances, or legitimize any future conflict against the regime.
I do agree, however you are ignoring the 'week' part. The hungry sheep will not wait for the unorganized liberal gov. to seize a truck. I have seen the fear and panic from a simple snow storm that caused empty stores. If the truckers can Force the liberal sheep to riot it would be the end of the Coup.
If the truckers can Force the liberal sheep to riot it would be the end of the Coup.
If they can force a riot, yes.
However, for all the reasons highlighted, they would be shut down before then. Individuals going on general strike don't generate scenarios that re self-sustaining or promote an avalanche effect in movement growth, unlike the canadian convoy.
Part of that is the psychological effect of physical solidarity: the presence of others, in an uncertain environment, working towards the same goal. It is a powerful effect to keep a movement's members all heading in the same direction. That and the physical presence forced the media into a feeding frenzy initially. Awareness drives growth. Thats how the state kills movements dangerous to it: ignore them.
You want to build something, you create a scenario where they have serious trouble ignoring you, and on top of that build it on the solidarity effect caused by physical presence of members among each other.
Why do you think the FBI breaks up right-wing organizations and militias before they even have a chance to officially establish themselves?
(post is archived)