This is not why they want an EV society. It's just one of the advantages they'll have.
This is not why they want an EV society. It's just one of the advantages they'll have.
Seriously. Do it by car, not by foot.
The entire plan only works when people are in vehicles. Thats how this thing works at a fundemental level.
makes it relatively harder for antifa/blm/state sponsored terrorists to commit a mass attack with their own vehicles.
shelters crowds from assault
allows people to leave on a dime (mostly), compared to being on foot. This is a boon if you hear about state actors like police unions or antifa converging on your location to break up your protest
makes it trivially easy to transport supplies, and supporters
causes police to lose the force multiplier of crowd control.
cuts to the heart of private property, the freedom to travel, and freedom of expression. When you're in your car its YOURS. They can't cite you for "standing in the road" or "loitering". Attacks on property by the state or antifa who the police work for, only lead to sympathy from the middle, unlike one-on-one fights which are far easier to deceptively edit and cast in a bad light. And as a bonus you get your horn, which amplifies the noise factor, and psychological impact of the protest, always a good thing.
The state confiscating cars, gas, or detaining people in their vehicles, or allowing rioters or police-union backed antifa to attack car, garners the sympathy of the middle and moderates.
because of these factors, the psychological barrier to showing up is much lower. On foot, people are disempowered relative to the state. In-vehicle, people feel empowered.
Vehicles make ample barricades, resource transportion, escape methods, defense, and shelter (unlike tents which can be broken, confiscated or discarded by marching columns of pro-antifa union police).
It is harder for police working for the regime to kettle protesters, or back them into a corner, or push them into a rioting mob of regime supporters, like the public union collaborators have done time and again.
A protest in vehicles, represents a protest of the middle class, represents a revolt of the tax base.
And that is what the canadian government, and state governments in the u.s. and australia, are just beginning to realize.
Protesting in vehicles works.
You know what happened to the last group of people that showed up to the convoy on foot?
An antifa terrorist ran them over.
This is the very reason the plan was written the way it was. To neutralize the state sponsoring, enabling, or tacitly allowing terrorism against us.
Seriously. Do it by car, not by foot.
The entire plan only works when people are *in vehicles*. Thats how this thing works at a fundemental level.
1. makes it relatively harder for antifa/blm/state sponsored terrorists to commit a mass attack with their own vehicles.
2. shelters crowds from assault
3. allows people to leave on a dime (mostly), compared to being on foot. This is a boon if you hear about state actors like police unions or antifa converging on your location to break up your protest
4. makes it trivially easy to transport supplies, and supporters
5. causes police to lose the force multiplier of crowd control.
6. cuts to the heart of private property, the freedom to travel, and freedom of expression. When you're in your car its YOURS. They can't cite you for "standing in the road" or "loitering". Attacks on property by the state or antifa who the police work for, only lead to sympathy from the middle, unlike one-on-one fights which are far easier to deceptively edit and cast in a bad light.
And as a bonus you get your horn, which amplifies the noise factor, and psychological impact of the protest, always a good thing.
7. The state confiscating cars, gas, or detaining people in their vehicles, or allowing rioters or police-union backed antifa to attack car, garners the sympathy of the middle and moderates.
8. because of these factors, the psychological barrier to showing up is *much* lower. On foot, people are disempowered relative to the state. In-vehicle, people feel empowered.
9. Vehicles make ample barricades, resource transportion, escape methods, defense, and shelter (unlike tents which can be broken, confiscated or discarded by marching columns of pro-antifa union police).
10. It is harder for police working for the regime to kettle protesters, or back them into a corner, or push them into a rioting mob of regime supporters, like the public union collaborators have done time and again.
A protest *in* vehicles, represents a protest of the middle class, represents a revolt of the tax base.
And that is what the canadian government, and state governments in the u.s. and australia, are just beginning to realize.
Protesting in vehicles *works*.
You know what happened to the last group of people that showed up to the convoy on foot?
An antifa terrorist ran them over.
This is the very reason the plan was written the way it was. To neutralize the state sponsoring, enabling, or tacitly allowing terrorism against us.
(post is archived)