Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

581

The u.s. today should have over 10,000 congressmen.

It makes it much harder and much more expensive to bribe, control, threaten, and blackmail, that many people versus the 435 we have today.

More to the point it makes seats 1. cheap to obtain, 2. expensive to hold,

So the DNC and its foreign lobbists on the left and the RNC and its woke-corporate-donors on the right, can't keep gaming the system at the expense and destruction of America.

Dilute the power of congress, and you dilute the influence of all the various lobby's and NGOs.

This is an issue both the left and the right can get on board with.

We should have one congressman per 30k people.

Never forget the south advocated for slaves counting as people for the sake of a vote.

And the north argued that slaves were property, and not people, so they didn't get a vote.

Maybe it won't make the situation better.

But it'll fuck up all sorts of the federal regimes plans and policies and power-sharing agreements.

Always increase chaos. Always accelerate.

↓ expand content
The u.s. today should have over 10,000 congressmen. It makes it much harder and *much* more expensive to bribe, control, threaten, and blackmail, that many people versus the 435 we have today. More to the point it makes seats 1. cheap to obtain, 2. expensive to hold, So the DNC and its foreign lobbists on the left and the RNC and its woke-corporate-donors on the right, can't keep gaming the system at the expense and destruction of America. Dilute the power of congress, and you dilute the influence of all the various lobby's and NGOs. This is an issue both the left and the right can get on board with. We should have one congressman per 30k people. Never forget the south advocated for slaves counting as people for the sake of a vote. And the north argued that slaves were property, and not people, so they didn't get a vote. Maybe it won't make the situation better. But it'll fuck up all sorts of the federal regimes plans and policies and power-sharing agreements. Always increase chaos. Always accelerate.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt 3y (edited 3y)

This is an interesting idea -makes sense. The only problem I can see off the top of my head is how it would be districted. For example, we know that most "red" voters are in suburban/rural areas. Let's say you have 30,000 people in within a square mile in the city. You might require 500 square miles in rural areas to find 30,000 people. You've made me curious what the ration of congress is per capita., I should probably know that, and I don't.

[–] • 1 pt 3y (edited 3y)

Getting out the word is one thing.

Memes are cheaper.

Make it a topic of discussion.

Push to the left.

"Anyone against expanding congress probably would have supported the 3/5ths compromise too."

They'll signal amplify all on their own because "racism".

Its a chinese fingertrap for congress. The more they argue against it or explain why, the harder it will be for them to distract from, direct, or ignore the issue, and the more it will become obvious to the public.