Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

"xyz supremacist" piggybacks on the very notion that being pro any race, is a bad thing. Its not. Pointing out the negatives or positives of any group is not a bad thing.

Call them "anti-white" and "bigots".

Bigots will upset them, so in a crowd, you win by default.

"anti-white" relies on the underlying and implicit assumption that being anti-white is a bad thing. So its an assertion with a lower-barrier of use than "racist!" Its a lower psychological barrier than open pro-caucasian advocacy, and it uses the slur of 'white' as a badge of honor.

Now our opponents have to explain why "saying that is racism! You can't say 'antiwhite'! Thats racism"

And you get to label them bigots and demand they explain why.

And when they do they will inevitibly go into how whites are bad.

And you dont even argue with them. You just repeat "ok, so thats anti-white. So you're a racist. You're a bigot. You're a black/jewish/muslim/socialist/etc anti-white racist bigot whos violent towards people you dont like, people who are white."

Just keep piling on from there, and as soon as they lose their cool, it will prove to third parties, either directly, or over time, that you were right.

Theres no coming back from first impressions like that.

↓ expand content
"xyz supremacist" piggybacks on the very notion that being *pro* any race, is a bad thing. Its not. Pointing out the negatives or positives of any group is not a bad thing. Call them "anti-white" and "bigots". Bigots will upset them, so in a crowd, you win by default. "anti-white" relies on the underlying and implicit assumption that being anti-white is a *bad* thing. So its an assertion with a lower-barrier of use than "racist!" Its a lower psychological barrier than open pro-caucasian advocacy, and it uses the slur of 'white' as a badge of honor. Now our opponents have to *explain* why "saying that is racism! You can't say 'antiwhite'! Thats racism" And you get to label them bigots and demand they explain why. And when they do they will inevitibly go into how whites are bad. And you dont even argue with them. You just repeat "ok, so thats anti-white. So you're a racist. You're a bigot. You're a black/jewish/muslim/socialist/etc anti-white racist bigot whos violent towards people you dont like, people who are white." Just keep piling on from there, and as soon as they lose their cool, it will prove to third parties, either directly, or over time, that you were right. Theres no coming back from first impressions like that.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt 3y

Notice how we don't need to resort to euphemisms to advance, unlike the paedophile progressive.

[–] • 1 pt 3y

What's your opinion on using the ethnic terms for indigenous people like someone can say they are pro-German or proud to be German without being subjected to an automatic SJW/leftist/markist racism or supremacist accusation?

[–] • 1 pt 3y

The german issue is distinct from the 'white' issue in terms of how the public has been propagandized. But the two terms, like 'kulak' are much closer in the public perception, than they were years ago.

On anti-german hate, I don't know. Anyone against germans I would just call germaphobes .