WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

Skip to the end for tl;dr version with only

  1. hijack movements name, logo, and nonviolent tactics first.

  2. free promotion by the left

  3. regime tries to resist take over of movements such as patriot front

  4. make slightly more controversial statements than regular patriot front

  5. controlled psyop patriot front is forced to escalate its own rhetoric, and/or the lefts followers start to ask "why arent you posting all this radical stuff coming from patriot front!"

  6. communist regime propagandists are forced to either acknowledge our version, or "defend" patriot front by calling us a "splinter group" or "infiltrators" of patriot front. EIther way we get to sockpuppet the left and discredit the regime for defending patriot front, and then spread rumors (which happen to be true) of patriot front by controlled opposition. Cue disillusionment by left base, which causes infighting and drives a wedge.

  7. People disengage and become demoralized.

The beautiful thing about this strategy is that it can be exercised almost entirely online, so its very cheap, and it can be done to any organization thats running "opposition" front groups.

Theres no real way to defend against it either.

Their very act of trying to control and limit the opposition, gives us an opening, or opportunity to hijack those very movements/organizations.

Being politically unknown is the equivalent to being powerless. So it either takes notoriety or money.

The right isn't moneyed like the left, but we can exercise controversy to gain notoriety. The grifters unironically showed the way. What we lacked was the magnification from the left that their controlled "right wing" grifters are given.

Until now.

Now we know how to hijack those systems of front-creation and promotion.

Let the enemy do the work, then virtue-spiral to force a struggle over who controls the movement.

Meaning they either have to shut the movement down (which they might), or escalate the rhetoric (which works for us because it alienates them from the moderate center, which is absolutely essential for mass-movement formation and recruitment).

tl;dr Just

  1. identity as part of the group (even though we're not)

  2. escalate rhetoric to a more controversial (but still legal) level.

  3. left is pinned between the horns of a dilemma: fight for control and alienate their base, or shut it down, and we win anyway.

We could do this every week, to a new grifter, a new movement, or regime "right wing" front group. Raises the cost of running these fronts, and pushes the regime back behind the ideological front line, into a defensive posture.

And it costs us almost nothing to follow this strategy.

↓ expand content
Skip to the end for tl;dr version with only 1. hijack movements name, logo, and nonviolent tactics first. 2. free promotion by the left 3. regime tries to resist take over of movements such as patriot front 4. make slightly more controversial statements than regular patriot front 5. controlled psyop patriot front is forced to escalate its own rhetoric, and/or the lefts followers start to ask "why arent you posting all this radical stuff coming from patriot front!" 6. communist regime propagandists are forced to either acknowledge our version, or "defend" patriot front by calling us a "splinter group" or "infiltrators" of patriot front. EIther way we get to sockpuppet the left and discredit the regime for defending patriot front, and then spread rumors (which happen to be true) of patriot front by controlled opposition. Cue disillusionment by left base, which causes infighting and drives a wedge. 7. People disengage and become demoralized. The beautiful thing about this strategy is that it can be exercised almost entirely online, so its very cheap, and it can be done to any organization thats running "opposition" front groups. Theres no real way to defend against it either. Their very act of trying to control and limit the opposition, gives us an opening, or opportunity to hijack those very movements/organizations. Being politically unknown is the equivalent to being powerless. So it either takes notoriety or money. The right isn't moneyed like the left, but we *can* exercise controversy to gain notoriety. The grifters unironically showed the way. What we lacked was the magnification from the left that their controlled "right wing" grifters are given. Until now. Now we know how to hijack those systems of front-creation and promotion. Let the enemy do the work, then virtue-spiral to force a struggle over who controls the movement. Meaning they either have to shut the movement down (which they might), or escalate the rhetoric (which works for us because it alienates them from the moderate center, which is absolutely essential for mass-movement formation and recruitment). tl;dr Just 1. identity as part of the group (even though we're not) 2. escalate rhetoric to a more controversial (but still legal) level. 3. left is pinned between the horns of a dilemma: fight for control and alienate their base, or shut it down, and we win anyway. We could do this every week, to a new grifter, a new movement, or regime "right wing" front group. Raises the cost of running these fronts, and pushes the regime back behind the ideological front line, into a defensive posture. And it costs us almost nothing to follow this strategy.

(post is archived)