WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

yt - who controls the media?(youtube.com)

Having watched this, its obvious, if you want to tear down middlemen of foreign powers, middlemen who rely on not being named, that all we have to do is ask the question.

I've come to realize the term "dogwhistle" is a cannard and dead letter. It's a defensive move by the regimes in the west, because it makes an assertion without any follow through.

The act of asking who controls the media? forces them to either answer, or to astroturf as faux conservatives, or "ebil white supreeemacists!". And then it makes it obvious who controls the media doesn't it?

Because we can be demonized all day, every day (and we are), so it doesn't matter if they continue.

But the act of trying the bad-optics and false-fronts-to-demonize us ultimately forces them to do the work for us.

And the extremism of their answer puts people in a difficult quandary:

The state has to accelerate hatespeech laws that explicitly ban specific questions.

And they'll have to be repressive about it.

Which only makes it more obvious.

Just about everyone hates nazis, and they're just an albatross boogieman-label anyway, one the ADL uses to keep americans from critizing israeli and british softpower.

But you know what everyone hates even more?

Being told what they can or cannot say or think.

This will also force the GOP to waffle and crack on the issue of freespeech and the leftwings suppression of ordinary americans everywhere, versus the muh-greatest-ally nonsense.

DNC won't be happen, and will try to ironically virtue signal about supporting freespeech and israel against "the hateful extremist white supremacist anti-jewish american right-wing" (everyone right of stalin, including moderates). And then we get to throw palistine in their face, and the DNCS rampant censorship and suppression of americans for years. If we're lucky, they'll even in some aspect, attempt to appeal to evangelicals.

At which point about a third of the public will be demoralized and alienated from both parties, if they aren't already.

Fracture the public in a three way and both DC and foreign lobbies lose the ability to control the public.

Questions are like wedges.

The more we ask them, the harder it will be for the regimes propaganda to swing its "big lie" hammer and avoid or suppress them. Instead they'll drive them deeper.

We should adamantly ask "who controls the media?" and similar questions.

And when its suggested

"You know."

We get the freebie of playing stupid, or even better, calling them nazis for suggesting it.

The proper answer is of course a dead serious "I don't know, tell me."

If they try to avoid answering, they then have to scapegoat, and turn their hamster wheels, wasting time and running in place in terms of the national narrative direction.

In fact we can use this to redirect their scapegoating like a destructive laser-beam of infighting, as they attempt to avoid answering or drawing attention to the answer. Just keep doing that and they'll destroy all their ancillary goons and useful idiot NGOs and institutions, until the middlemen of foreign lobbies stand naked and alone.

Who controls the media?

Be adamant about not knowing, and not answering. And just repeat it vehemently, almost like a slogan.

↓ expand content
[yt - who controls the media?](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sOViI_pkr4) Having watched this, its obvious, if you want to tear down middlemen of foreign powers, middlemen who rely on not being named, that all we have to do is ask the question. I've come to realize the term "dogwhistle" is a cannard and dead letter. It's a defensive move by the regimes in the west, because it makes an assertion without any follow through. The act of asking *who controls the media?* forces them to either answer, or to astroturf as faux conservatives, or "ebil white supreeemacists!". And then it makes it obvious who controls the media doesn't it? Because we can be demonized all day, every day (and we are), so it doesn't matter if they continue. But the act of trying the bad-optics and false-fronts-to-demonize us ultimately forces them to do the work for us. And the extremism of their answer puts people in a difficult quandary: The state has to accelerate hatespeech laws that *explicitly* ban specific questions. And they'll have to be repressive about it. Which only makes it more obvious. Just about everyone hates nazis, and they're just an albatross boogieman-label anyway, one the ADL uses to keep americans from critizing israeli and british softpower. But you know what everyone hates even more? Being told what they can or cannot say or think. This will also force the GOP to waffle and crack on the issue of freespeech and the leftwings suppression of ordinary americans everywhere, **versus** the muh-greatest-ally nonsense. DNC won't be happen, and will try to ironically virtue signal about supporting freespeech and israel against "the hateful extremist white supremacist anti-jewish american right-wing" (everyone right of stalin, including moderates). And then we get to throw palistine in their face, and the DNCS rampant censorship and suppression of americans for years. If we're lucky, they'll even in some aspect, attempt to appeal to evangelicals. At which point about a third of the public will be demoralized and alienated from both parties, if they aren't already. Fracture the public in a three way and both DC and foreign lobbies lose the ability to control the public. Questions are like wedges. The more we ask them, the harder it will be for the regimes propaganda to swing its "big lie" hammer and avoid or suppress them. Instead they'll drive them deeper. We should *adamantly* ask "who controls the media?" and similar questions. And when its suggested "You know." We get the freebie of playing stupid, or even better, calling *them* nazis for suggesting it. The proper answer is of course a dead serious "I don't know, tell me." If they try to avoid answering, they then have to scapegoat, and turn their hamster wheels, wasting time and running in place in terms of the national narrative direction. In fact we can use this to redirect their scapegoating like a destructive laser-beam of infighting, as they attempt to avoid answering or drawing attention to the answer. Just keep doing that and they'll destroy all their ancillary goons and useful idiot NGOs and institutions, until the middlemen of foreign lobbies stand naked and alone. Who controls the media? Be adamant about not knowing, and not answering. And just repeat it vehemently, almost like a slogan.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt 3y

But you know what everyone hates even more? Being told what they can or cannot say or think.

I used to believe that. I don't know if I've gotten wiser, or the world has changed, but I think that you're making a false assumption. It now seems like (many? most?) people enjoy being programmed to surrender any personal accountability, and just submit to what they've been ordered to do, as long as they're 'liked' on 'social' media, and the netflix remains uninterrupted.

[–] 0 pt 3y (edited 3y)

I used to believe that. I don't know if I've gotten wiser, or the world has changed, but I think that you're making a false assumption.

That may be a fair assumption. Elaborate.

people enjoy being programmed to surrender any personal accountability, and just submit to what they've been ordered to do, as long as they're 'liked' on 'social' media, and the netflix remains uninterrupted.

Yes, indecent percentage of people believe what they're told enough times, regardless of the veracity.

The situation being "hopeless to change" as it were (my interpretation of your words) is different from the current scenario in the u.s. and abroad.

Because assuming that is what you're getting at, the difference between people being actively brainwashed, and the situation being hopeless is this:

We

  1. know the mechanics (big lie technique - loudest megaphone wins),

  2. who/what orgs specifically are funding it (pharmaceutical companies, same thing they do when theres a mass murder, blame the gun if possible to distract from the pharmaceuticals involved)

  3. What the tools are to spread the lie: media companies, big five in the social media sector, certain others.

These are big problems and big opponents for sure, and they should and will be held to account.

But big problems are different from unsolveable problems.

And while we're talking about it, look around you.

"enjoy"?

Look around you, do you see too many happy people?

The "comfortably numb" are miserable. Thats why they're revolting. It just so happens the revolt is being lead by the state, against everything non-state. Why? To placate them. To pressure release.

And why does the regime have to do that, placate them, if it has absolute power?

Have you asked that lately?

Look I'm a horrible cynic, so when i say they're not invincible, it is not motivated out of any sort of hope or delusion.

The state, the regime, the occupation, congress, whatever you call them, are not invincible.

Goliath fell too.

And so will they.

They are not gods. They're not even immortals. They're warm fleshy bodies, full of blood and organs and all the other things that make people, just like the rest of us. They fear. They sleep. They get exhausted. They can be run ragged. They can be run in circles. They can be mislead and be misdirected. They succumb to pressure. To leverage. To greed. To the idea of inevitability: the inevitability of age, ruling a vast well armed continent, the inevitability of the limits of power, all of it. They make mistakes, they overlook their underlings incompetence. They run out of other peoples money and get booted out of office and are put to trial or die of old age. Makes no difference.

Power fails in the face of its own hubris.

You just gotta not give up. Resist and push forward longer than its worth for them to continue.

↓ expand content
[–] 0 pt 3y

Thank you for a well-considered response.

I don't think it's hopeless, when I watch a double-masked moron go rolling past alone in their car, it does seem a little pointless though.

We (1) know

I'd phrase it more like We know... We know and share info, but with pretty much everyone else, I can show clear evidence, and they'd rather turn a blind eye to it, and carry on as they were. I think the only two times I've gotten a sniff of people agreeing something might not be right was asking "If the nurses are so overworked, how do they have the energy to choreograph dance routines?" and "Isn't it weird that Fauci and Tam are both more interested in fucking-glory-holes than they are with keeping people safe from the deadly-deadly disease?"

Resist and push forward longer than its worth

I have been doing that pre-9/11, pre-Fight Club, etc. I'm just venting, because I confess, I'm annoyed that some days it feels like I'm the only local running guerrilla ops, and the only ones I can communicate with without sounding crazy are anonymous and online.

[–] 0 pt 3y

Cool it with the antisemitism. Oy vey!