The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is to prime the public for the racial conflict narrative. Heres why. Assuming hyperinflation is coming (it is), there is one sure fire way to maintain control: Create an evil vs. good narrative. The military, trained to be "anti-racist" would immediately be pitted against moderates and conservatives if racial conflict starts to happen regularly in the u.s. Any larger organization would be broken-down by authorities and infiltration and gatekeeping, but theres no reason the occupation wouldn't fund, organize, and train both black and white militants, and aid them in committing weekly and daily attacks. If you understand this is to pit the military against the public, create a witch hunt, and distract from the collapse (or create a scapegoat) while demonizing, disarming, and looting the middleclass, then you understand why this is exactly the occupation's plan. This is why Kyle's trial is being spread right now. Why its being dragged out (to time it to jab deaths or bioweapon deaths, and hyperinflation). This is why its being made an explicitly racial issue, even though Kyle harmed no blacks. Over the coming couple of weeks blacks and latinos will increasingly be pitted against kyle, and be pushed to believe that his trial is a bellwether about discrimination and "white privilege" in the system. Meanwhile us whites will be brought to believe (correctly) that the outcome of his trial is a direct prediction of our treatment en mass as a shrinking minority in the near future. Christians will be thrown in with "white supremacists/nationalists". Gun owners will likewise be demonized, and propaganda will be designed to make us correctly believe that this is absolutely going to be precedent setting against firearms. Conservatives will be made to understand this trial failing Kyle, will be a fundamental shift in how conservatism and the right to community and self defense will be treated going forward. In fact, what leads me to believe this, more than anything is that regardless of the trial outcome, innocent or guilty, theres no downside for the occupation if it pursues this plan. It 1. polarizes the public 2. creates pretexts for riots. 3. drives the racial issue. Summary 1. Kyles case is being pushed hard 2. They are dragging their feet where normally they would rush the process 3. This means they intend to use it to polarize the public 4. It is being cast as an explicitly racial narrative 5. At the same time cases of racial violence (always black on white, etc) are being spread far and wide, an obvious pivot by western nations toward an equally obvious racial-violence narrative 6. The occupation government of the united states and its partners and vassals in "ally" nations need a scapegoat bad. They also need a *thorough* and *iron-cast* case for military in the streets and vastly expanded power. 7. Which would explain the militaries of the west being purged right now. No dissenters on a moderate/conservative flavor == no problem with leftwing troops committing suppression and atrocities against citizens, especially of the wrong skin color (white), the wrong religion (christian), the wrong sex (men), the wrong sexuality (straight), etc. Anything that creates a psychological profile that makes someone resistant or likely to fight against occupation policies of degradation (destruction of traditions, brainwashing of children into sterility operations such as transexualism), torture (political prisoners, e.x. J6), deprivation (rationing to only the politically obedient), threats (antifa, blm), and domination (courts and occupation spies and federal enforcer/political police). Kyle's case is the opening salvo in this new narrative. I'd bet money on it. To combat this we should focus *exclusively* on covid. Covid lockdowns. Covid deaths. Kyle and J6 of course shouldn't be abandoned, but when talking about it we should talk about it in BROAD terms. The middle has to be convinced his persecution is wrong. And the middle isn't listening to evidence right now, so we have to talk in terms of emotion: The issues to push here, instead of the occupation's "race war" narrative, are 1. religious right, 2. firearm ownership as sacred tradition, 3. us-vs-them tit-for-tat style arguments "well antifa and blm burned cities!" in order to drag the argument down into the mud and divide their base of support. This will demoralize that part of the middle that leans against him, and make them undecided as they say "well thats true!' and suddenly find themselves censored, threatened, and doxed for taking a moderate position. 4. protecting our families and innocent communities rather than making it about property. 5. Why didn't the GOP stop it? (because this will force them to verbally attack the left and put congress on the defensive about either sitting back and allowing it, or actively encouraging it).