Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

633

Hitler had major problems with Deutschland's propaganda in WW1.

The TLDR of how they sucked at propaganda: 1) they tried to explain things analytically to the common people, appealing to their intellect instead of emotion. This doesn't work. 2) they pointed out many enemies, instead of focusing people on a single enemy that encompassed as many of the enemies of Germany as possible. Hitler believed the common man to be incomprehensibly stupid with the attention span of a goldfish (my words, but accurate). He emphasized over and over that there must be a clear, decisive message that rallies a people around a cause and focuses their energy on a single target, one at a time.

That's the struggle we're having in the 2020's dealing with international jewry. The term "jew" is so stigmatized that it immediately shuts off the common man's brain. "Demonrats", "Liberals" etc are all massive failures, because they don't point directly at the problem. "Zionist" is retarded, because the common man cannot understand the links between the Rothschild dynasty, international banking and how it controls the means of production and therefore politicians, the foundation of the state of israel, and the beliefs in the Talmud. It's too fucking complicated. "Globalists" could be fucking anyone. The "Illuminati", "Jesuits", "Khazarian mafia" are bullshit distractions.

The point is, Hitler's criticisms of WW1 Germany's propaganda apply to US conservatives now. We've picked dozens of enemies, and no one understands what any of them are!

Trump bamboozled everyone by pointing their attention at illegal immigrants (but not the jewish NGOs facilitating their immigration, or the jew banker financed politicians who literally paid them to come here illegally). He did a fantastic fucking job at it too, but he chose the wrong enemy on purpose. This was an annoyance to the jewish overlords, and had no chance of leading back to them. They still lambasted him for it, but he effectively distracted America for four years.

I don't think there is a silver bullet here, and I think that is by design. The enemy is transnational, isn't necessarily israeli at all, and avoids sunlight wherever possible. That's really hard to pin down!

So what is the single enemy that best encompasses all of this bullshit?

Probably jews. Unfortunate for the rare jew who is based and isn't tacitly supporting the genocide of Whites in their own countries, but yeah. I think it's "jew".

Hitler had major problems with Deutschland's propaganda in WW1. The TLDR of how they sucked at propaganda: 1) they tried to explain things analytically to the common people, appealing to their intellect instead of emotion. This doesn't work. 2) they pointed out many enemies, instead of focusing people on a single enemy that encompassed as many of the enemies of Germany as possible. Hitler believed the common man to be incomprehensibly stupid with the attention span of a goldfish (my words, but accurate). He emphasized over and over that there must be a clear, decisive message that rallies a people around a cause and focuses their energy on a single target, one at a time. That's the struggle we're having in the 2020's dealing with international jewry. The term "jew" is so stigmatized that it immediately shuts off the common man's brain. "Demonrats", "Liberals" etc are all massive failures, because they don't point directly at the problem. "Zionist" is retarded, because the common man cannot understand the links between the Rothschild dynasty, international banking and how it controls the means of production and therefore politicians, the foundation of the state of israel, and the beliefs in the Talmud. It's too fucking complicated. "Globalists" could be fucking anyone. The "Illuminati", "Jesuits", "Khazarian mafia" are bullshit distractions. The point is, Hitler's criticisms of WW1 Germany's propaganda apply to US conservatives now. We've picked dozens of enemies, and no one understands what any of them are! Trump bamboozled everyone by pointing their attention at illegal immigrants (but not the jewish NGOs facilitating their immigration, or the jew banker financed politicians who literally paid them to come here illegally). He did a fantastic fucking job at it too, but he chose the wrong enemy on purpose. This was an annoyance to the jewish overlords, and had no chance of leading back to them. They still lambasted him for it, but he effectively distracted America for four years. I don't think there is a silver bullet here, and I think that is by design. The enemy is transnational, isn't necessarily israeli at all, and avoids sunlight wherever possible. That's really hard to pin down! So what is the single enemy that best encompasses all of this bullshit? Probably jews. Unfortunate for the rare jew who is based and isn't tacitly supporting the genocide of Whites in their own countries, but yeah. I think it's "jew".

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (8).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

The Mormons and Amish have a chance. You need to be able to recruit people who have been in your group since childhood, so you know you can trust them. A giant mob of internet red pilled people is too easy to infiltrate and subvert. I'm not saying it's worthless, but it is unlikely to hold up for any period of time. They'll subvert it just like occupy wallstreet or any of the other grassroots movements.

It's something that could grow out of local church groups, if they still existed in any meaningful way.

[–] • 0 pt

So we can agree that a no1 priority would be to properly background check members in order to avoid subversion.

This could be achieved by taking in members through reference system from existing members, and having a secret unit within the organization that would do random "spot checks" of all members by covertly monitoring movement and activates of members to detect if anyone is involved in anything suspicious.

[–] • 0 pt

Background checks and linking to other members is critical, agree.

The other thing is compartmentalization and decentralization. You can't have everyone knowing everyone elses' identity, or having access to that information. You really can't have anyone with that information.

Shows you just how "free" we are that you have to create decentralized cells of people in order to form a political party.

[–] • 1 pt

Yes, don't keep all the eggs in one basket. If a team goes down, their arrest won't be an issue if they don't know anything that could compromise others.

Also communication between groups should be minimal and on need-to-know basis + ranking system to decide who gets to handle sensitive information and make critical decisions.