Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

495

Hitler had major problems with Deutschland's propaganda in WW1.

The TLDR of how they sucked at propaganda: 1) they tried to explain things analytically to the common people, appealing to their intellect instead of emotion. This doesn't work. 2) they pointed out many enemies, instead of focusing people on a single enemy that encompassed as many of the enemies of Germany as possible. Hitler believed the common man to be incomprehensibly stupid with the attention span of a goldfish (my words, but accurate). He emphasized over and over that there must be a clear, decisive message that rallies a people around a cause and focuses their energy on a single target, one at a time.

That's the struggle we're having in the 2020's dealing with international jewry. The term "jew" is so stigmatized that it immediately shuts off the common man's brain. "Demonrats", "Liberals" etc are all massive failures, because they don't point directly at the problem. "Zionist" is retarded, because the common man cannot understand the links between the Rothschild dynasty, international banking and how it controls the means of production and therefore politicians, the foundation of the state of israel, and the beliefs in the Talmud. It's too fucking complicated. "Globalists" could be fucking anyone. The "Illuminati", "Jesuits", "Khazarian mafia" are bullshit distractions.

The point is, Hitler's criticisms of WW1 Germany's propaganda apply to US conservatives now. We've picked dozens of enemies, and no one understands what any of them are!

Trump bamboozled everyone by pointing their attention at illegal immigrants (but not the jewish NGOs facilitating their immigration, or the jew banker financed politicians who literally paid them to come here illegally). He did a fantastic fucking job at it too, but he chose the wrong enemy on purpose. This was an annoyance to the jewish overlords, and had no chance of leading back to them. They still lambasted him for it, but he effectively distracted America for four years.

I don't think there is a silver bullet here, and I think that is by design. The enemy is transnational, isn't necessarily israeli at all, and avoids sunlight wherever possible. That's really hard to pin down!

So what is the single enemy that best encompasses all of this bullshit?

Probably jews. Unfortunate for the rare jew who is based and isn't tacitly supporting the genocide of Whites in their own countries, but yeah. I think it's "jew".

Hitler had major problems with Deutschland's propaganda in WW1. The TLDR of how they sucked at propaganda: 1) they tried to explain things analytically to the common people, appealing to their intellect instead of emotion. This doesn't work. 2) they pointed out many enemies, instead of focusing people on a single enemy that encompassed as many of the enemies of Germany as possible. Hitler believed the common man to be incomprehensibly stupid with the attention span of a goldfish (my words, but accurate). He emphasized over and over that there must be a clear, decisive message that rallies a people around a cause and focuses their energy on a single target, one at a time. That's the struggle we're having in the 2020's dealing with international jewry. The term "jew" is so stigmatized that it immediately shuts off the common man's brain. "Demonrats", "Liberals" etc are all massive failures, because they don't point directly at the problem. "Zionist" is retarded, because the common man cannot understand the links between the Rothschild dynasty, international banking and how it controls the means of production and therefore politicians, the foundation of the state of israel, and the beliefs in the Talmud. It's too fucking complicated. "Globalists" could be fucking anyone. The "Illuminati", "Jesuits", "Khazarian mafia" are bullshit distractions. The point is, Hitler's criticisms of WW1 Germany's propaganda apply to US conservatives now. We've picked dozens of enemies, and no one understands what any of them are! Trump bamboozled everyone by pointing their attention at illegal immigrants (but not the jewish NGOs facilitating their immigration, or the jew banker financed politicians who literally paid them to come here illegally). He did a fantastic fucking job at it too, but he chose the wrong enemy on purpose. This was an annoyance to the jewish overlords, and had no chance of leading back to them. They still lambasted him for it, but he effectively distracted America for four years. I don't think there is a silver bullet here, and I think that is by design. The enemy is transnational, isn't necessarily israeli at all, and avoids sunlight wherever possible. That's really hard to pin down! So what is the single enemy that best encompasses all of this bullshit? Probably jews. Unfortunate for the rare jew who is based and isn't tacitly supporting the genocide of Whites in their own countries, but yeah. I think it's "jew".

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

It's the jews wtf are you talking about? 'muh stigma' who cares once you penetrate that it's gone. Our enemy is jews and their defense is that stigma. It's a paper thin defense with many holes to exploit that only works because of the Holocaust TM, once that defense is down though you realize what comes next? If the majority recognised the jews evil there would be a movement to expell them, nobody would care when their family died from jew jabs and their kids think they are transgender foxkin xirtards. Democrats, chyna, immigranta and blacks are symptoms of jews. And its not just Zionists, illuminati, Israel etc it's all fucking jews till proven otherwise. We have the evidence we need to condemn them they can provide the Burden of evidence that they are clean.

When you know the jq you every single other problem becomes secondary.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Nice job reading the first sentences of what I wrote, arguing with me, and not realizing that's exactly what I wrote at the end.

[–] • 0 pt

I read 90%, i saw you say its probably the jews but you had a round about way of getting there. Glad we agree. I do see your point though and my tone was probably unwarranted so sorry for the petulance. You had valid points about the message being vague, for the left everyone is a nazi and they have to prove otherwise, the problem is that the right prides the military and american military pride mostly comes from 'beating the bad guys in WWII', so the right doesnt want to abandon that and caves to the left on that. Calling out the jews validates the left which is a hurdle, but i have no other enemy than the jew, id love to give them another name but no other name works, i could call them canaanites and perhaps that could redpill some jew lovers but it puts a burden of evidence on me i dont need since i have to explain their canaanite origins and their hatred of hebrews and if they love jews they will just say their baste jew buddies disagree.

I guess a hurdle is making people understand how the jew is hurting them, its bizarre because we watch the west self destruct with shitty white puppets controlled by jews, you and i know its the jews but proving that to a shabbos goy boy gets you nowhere.

Unfortunately naming the jew is the only solution, working within their framework is impossible and it allows the blame to be shifted over and over. Till the jew is addressed there can be no solutions, solving the jewish question will be the final answer.

[–] • 1 pt

The thing is that we don't need to have 100% of the population awaken and aware of the jewish problem. With the amount of programming that went into their brain it will take decades of work to get the average normie to a level of someone who just joined Poal.

There is quiet enough redpilled White people out there, the main problem is to get us organized IRL, since glowies are working actively to fuck us over and infiltrate our groups.

I'm not trying to fedpost and get Poalers to meet IRL, but we should at least consider brainstorming and discussing tactics of how to join up with other like minded people IRL, get funding and become active while avoiding breaking of any laws that would give (((them))) a reason to crack down on you.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

The Mormons and Amish have a chance. You need to be able to recruit people who have been in your group since childhood, so you know you can trust them. A giant mob of internet red pilled people is too easy to infiltrate and subvert. I'm not saying it's worthless, but it is unlikely to hold up for any period of time. They'll subvert it just like occupy wallstreet or any of the other grassroots movements.

It's something that could grow out of local church groups, if they still existed in any meaningful way.

[–] • 0 pt

So we can agree that a no1 priority would be to properly background check members in order to avoid subversion.

This could be achieved by taking in members through reference system from existing members, and having a secret unit within the organization that would do random "spot checks" of all members by covertly monitoring movement and activates of members to detect if anyone is involved in anything suspicious.

[–] • 0 pt

Background checks and linking to other members is critical, agree.

The other thing is compartmentalization and decentralization. You can't have everyone knowing everyone elses' identity, or having access to that information. You really can't have anyone with that information.

Shows you just how "free" we are that you have to create decentralized cells of people in order to form a political party.