Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

Read about Operation trust. (en.wikipedia.org)

Operation Trust was a counterintelligence operation of the State Political Directorate (GPU) of the Soviet Union. The operation, which was set up by GPU's predecessor Cheka, ran from 1921 to 1926, set up a fake anti-Bolshevik resistance organization, "Monarchist Union of Central Russia", MUCR in order to help the OGPU identify real monarchists and anti-Bolsheviks. The created front company was called the Moscow Municipal Credit Association.

That's what "QAnon" is. It's a fake resistance movement that prevents people from organizing themselves while identifying them.

I didn't know what was going on fully in 2020, and started learning about jews and loxism in 2021 and started to do deeper reading over the last year. The QAnon bullshit almost stopped me from continuing down that path. I would have to wade through two-dozen mouth breather "trust the plan"/"demonrats"/"Muh Chyna" comments to get to one real comment on places like Gab.

We shouldn't tolerate these cock-suckers. It's a tactic. Chew them out a few times, and if they still spread Qanon/flat-earth/jesuit bullshit, BAN!

[Read about Operation trust.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Trust) >Operation Trust was a counterintelligence operation of the State Political Directorate (GPU) of the Soviet Union. The operation, which was set up by GPU's predecessor Cheka, ran from 1921 to 1926, set up a fake anti-Bolshevik resistance organization, "Monarchist Union of Central Russia", MUCR in order to help the OGPU identify real monarchists and anti-Bolsheviks. The created front company was called the Moscow Municipal Credit Association. That's what "QAnon" is. It's a fake resistance movement that prevents people from organizing themselves while identifying them. I didn't know what was going on fully in 2020, and started learning about jews and loxism in 2021 and started to do deeper reading over the last year. The QAnon bullshit almost stopped me from continuing down that path. I would have to wade through two-dozen mouth breather "trust the plan"/"demonrats"/"Muh Chyna" comments to get to one real comment on places like Gab. We shouldn't tolerate these cock-suckers. It's a tactic. Chew them out a few times, and if they still spread Qanon/flat-earth/jesuit bullshit, BAN!

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (52).
[–] • 0 pt

Trump or Scavino had to send tweets from their accounts at the time of the timestamps. If they sent tweets out that didn't broadcast, that raises a flag. If tweets were sent out without them sending them, that raises a flag. Trump and Scavino were in on coordinating the timestamp deltas with Q. (((Twitter))) had no idea of the deltas until hours later when someone published a Qproof about it. Trump broadcast a few Qposts himself, signed Q+. Try again.

[–] • 0 pt

Trump or Scavino had to send tweets from their accounts at the time of the timestamps. If they sent tweets out that didn't broadcast, that raises a flag. If tweets were sent out without them sending them, that raises a flag. Trump and Scavino were in on coordinating the timestamp deltas with Q. (((Twitter))) had no idea of the deltas until hours later when someone published a Qproof about it. Trump broadcast a few Qposts himself, signed Q+. Try again.

That's a very naïve understanding of how software systems work. And how do you that Scavino was involved? Try again.

[–] • 0 pt

BTW, I was a CS/EE. I know how software works.

[–] • 0 pt

BTW, I was a CS/EE. I know how software works.

Then you should be able to come up with quite a few ways that these delta proofs could be created by parties not involved with Trump and still appear to be linked together. Did Trump ever acknowledge a Q proof as intentional on his part? Would he go along with it if he wasn't involved but it helped his fan base to believe in him?

Fellow EE/CS here, btw.

[–] • 0 pt

Scavino tweets were involved in many Qproofs. Where have you been?

[–] • 0 pt

All of your points revolve around the idea that these proofs were 100% authentic. Think bigger. As Q said, you have more than you know.