suppose its 4pm and you live in Palestine. You get a call from your reuters guy. he tells you to get your video camera. You need a reaction shot to breaking news that the u.s. is under attack. Your guy doesnt call for reactions in iraq. Not iran. Not israel. Not saudi arabia. just palestine. Within an hour you are outside, telling some kids and some lady theyll be on tv if they give the best responses. They ablidge, probably because they are in fact gleeful. Tape is sold to reuters eithin 90 mins of the 1st call. 11.30am in new york. Every network now has a copy. Script writers obediently get to work writing copy. Within 30 mins they turn it around and get the talking points dialed in. Peter jenning's producer has 15 mins before going live of the cheering feed, script in hand. I suppose, now that i look at it again its very possible. But how does all of that track. are they reporting the news? Or, within hours of 911 confirmed to be an attack, are they directing reality tv to inflame passions.
This exercise was to determine if there was time for them to put this together for Jennings. We started out a few days ago thinking it wasn't possible. I think we now agree there was time.
But how does all of that track. are they reporting the news? Or, within hours of 911 confirmed to be an attack, are they directing reality tv to inflame passions.
Of course they are working to strengthen (((their narratives))) in spite of any real news for worldwide consumption, after all they are (((MSM))). They manipulate the news to support (((their agenda))).
The timestamp in palestine of Sep 12 stll doesnt make sense
I rewatched the video 2x looking for it. Where in the video did you see Sept 12?
(post is archived)