How do you reconcile your positive experiences and positive examples with regard to nonwhites in real life, with what you know about the statistics and science with regard to race?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (29).

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

(edited )

White people are the only people you can talk into allowing themselves to be genocided.

And the whites who are far more evil than those jews ever could've been, will be spared from this fate,

No. Fuck that. Also it's such a Kike thing to claim that Jewish evil has a limit that is lesser than White people. Fuck off. Go learn about MENA populations. Go learn about Blood "Libel."

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Are those the only two options?

Genociding vs being genocide?

Is there some other options we aren't considering hete?

First, we should state our goals: The survival and well being of white people.

Where does killing anyone figure into achieving this goal?

Why does protecting something from destruction ever necessitate attacking or destroying something else?

All we have to do is remove the threats to our people, which can be done without making entire people into our enemies.

Loving your people should never require hating another people.

I think the main issue is miscommunication and misconception. We solve the first by talking, not fighting, and we solve the second by teaching them what they do not know.

Their hate of us is fuelled by ignorance what we need to do is address the reasons people have fid hating our race, and defuse these reasons.

Our history education only shows whites doing bad things, giving the impression of whites are uniquely evil.

So showing when nonwhites did bad things is a good way to make us just seem human.

People blame white people for the issues facing other races, and they have some incomplete or fallacious arguments for what that is.

What we have to do is first address the arguments and show why they are bad, then once we sweep away the concept of white people being to blame for the problems of other races, we can move onto providing the real answers as to why racial inequalities and disparities exist in the most careful and respectful way possible.

Then we can talk about political systems, and why the kind of system that whites tend to have a seemingly unique preference for has the best track record, and that the alternatives all have terrible records to them.

Other actions can be taken like this which do not employ the use of force or aggression to achieve our aims.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

My advice to you is to write in paragraphs, and try not to ask too many diverging questions.

Are those the only two options? Genociding vs being genocide?

Genocide is only necessary because they refuse to leave us alone, because they refuse to allow us to separate and have autonomy, they refuse to even accept us as a legitimate body of people, they refuse to even listen to us. So it is inevitable, "their blood is on their hands." Jews specifically have no real excuse. There are all these white degenerates & psychopaths, broken people, and the Jews had the biggest hand in forming them, it's only fair that they be devoured by the monster of their own creation.

Why are you conflating "nonwhites" as the same thing?

Loving your people should never require hating another people.

Incredibly infantile. Universal love is complete indifference. If you love something, you have a preference for it, you place it above other things. It is innately discriminatory, just as beauty is innately hierarchical. If you love your family, you want to protect them, that doesn't mean you have to go out of your way to hurt other families. But if you have to make a decision between your family and saving another family, it's your own family that would be chosen. If another family attacks your family, brutally, you have to do what is necessary.

“Love, the natural, healthy kind, is indeed what makes the world go round, and is the most beautiful, holy miracle we ever see here on this earth. BUT WITHOUT A DEADLY HATE OF THAT WHICH THREATENS WHAT WE LOVE, LOVE IS AN EMPTY WORD, A CATCHWORD FOR HIPPIES, QUEERS, AND COWARDS.” - G L Rockwell

Other actions can be taken like this which do not employ the use of force or aggression to achieve our aims.

Wow, how's the weather in the parallel timeline you're living in? My timeline, however, is looking bleak. You can do what you like but it's deluded and utterly effeminate bullshit to claim that it can all be achieved without violence or aggression or force.

My advice to you is to write in paragraphs, and try not to ask too many diverging questions. >Are those the only two options? Genociding vs being genocide? Genocide is only necessary because they refuse to leave us alone, because they refuse to allow us to separate and have autonomy, they refuse to even accept us as a legitimate body of people, they refuse to even listen to us. So it is inevitable, "their blood is on their hands." Jews specifically have no real excuse. There are all these white degenerates & psychopaths, broken people, and the Jews had the biggest hand in forming them, it's only fair that they be devoured by the monster of their own creation. Why are you conflating "nonwhites" as the same thing? >Loving your people should never require hating another people. Incredibly infantile. Universal love is complete indifference. If you love something, you have a preference for it, you place it above other things. It is innately discriminatory, just as beauty is innately hierarchical. If you love your family, you want to protect them, that doesn't mean you have to go out of your way to hurt other families. But if you have to make a decision between your family and saving another family, it's your own family that would be chosen. If another family attacks your family, brutally, you have to do what is necessary. “Love, the natural, healthy kind, is indeed what makes the world go round, and is the most beautiful, holy miracle we ever see here on this earth. BUT WITHOUT A DEADLY HATE OF THAT WHICH THREATENS WHAT WE LOVE, LOVE IS AN EMPTY WORD, A CATCHWORD FOR HIPPIES, QUEERS, AND COWARDS.” - G L Rockwell >Other actions can be taken like this which do not employ the use of force or aggression to achieve our aims. Wow, how's the weather in the parallel timeline you're living in? My timeline, however, is looking bleak. You can do what you like but it's deluded and utterly effeminate bullshit to claim that it can all be achieved without violence or aggression or force.

parent
link