My advice to you is to write in paragraphs, and try not to ask too many diverging questions.
Are those the only two options? Genociding vs being genocide?
Genocide is only necessary because they refuse to leave us alone, because they refuse to allow us to separate and have autonomy, they refuse to even accept us as a legitimate body of people, they refuse to even listen to us. So it is inevitable, "their blood is on their hands." Jews specifically have no real excuse. There are all these white degenerates & psychopaths, broken people, and the Jews had the biggest hand in forming them, it's only fair that they be devoured by the monster of their own creation.
Why are you conflating "nonwhites" as the same thing?
Loving your people should never require hating another people.
Incredibly infantile. Universal love is complete indifference. If you love something, you have a preference for it, you place it above other things. It is innately discriminatory, just as beauty is innately hierarchical. If you love your family, you want to protect them, that doesn't mean you have to go out of your way to hurt other families. But if you have to make a decision between your family and saving another family, it's your own family that would be chosen. If another family attacks your family, brutally, you have to do what is necessary.
“Love, the natural, healthy kind, is indeed what makes the world go round, and is the most beautiful, holy miracle we ever see here on this earth. BUT WITHOUT A DEADLY HATE OF THAT WHICH THREATENS WHAT WE LOVE, LOVE IS AN EMPTY WORD, A CATCHWORD FOR HIPPIES, QUEERS, AND COWARDS.” - G L Rockwell
Other actions can be taken like this which do not employ the use of force or aggression to achieve our aims.
Wow, how's the weather in the parallel timeline you're living in? My timeline, however, is looking bleak. You can do what you like but it's deluded and utterly effeminate bullshit to claim that it can all be achieved without violence or aggression or force.
(post is archived)