WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

369

. . . . Another factor to consider is the color of the tattoo. In a matched analysis comparing individuals with similar characteristics, those with black or grey tattoos had a 23 percent higher risk of lymphoma. Those with both black and colored tattoos had a 21 percent higher risk compared to people without tattoos.

In a broader, less-controlled analysis, the risk was even higher for black and grey tattoos, showing a 32 percent increase, and lower for tattoos with both black and colored ink, with an 11 percent increase. Of note, this broader analysis may have been influenced by other factors, such as lifestyle or health differences between groups.

Black ink often contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are known to be carcinogenic and can increase the risk of cancer. Colored inks, on the other hand, may contain primary aromatic amines. Both may contain metals like arsenic, lead, and chromium. . . .

>. . . . Another factor to consider is the color of the tattoo. In a matched analysis comparing individuals with similar characteristics, those with black or grey tattoos had a 23 percent higher risk of lymphoma. Those with both black and colored tattoos had a 21 percent higher risk compared to people without tattoos. >In a broader, less-controlled analysis, the risk was even higher for black and grey tattoos, showing a 32 percent increase, and lower for tattoos with both black and colored ink, with an 11 percent increase. Of note, this broader analysis may have been influenced by other factors, such as lifestyle or health differences between groups. >Black ink often contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are known to be carcinogenic and can increase the risk of cancer. Colored inks, on the other hand, may contain primary aromatic amines. Both may contain metals like arsenic, lead, and chromium. . . . [Archive](https://archive.today/fHPTV)

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Just wait till they do a mass spectrometer on prison ink in tats.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

I wonder what that means for removal, since it basically explodes the ink particles into smaller particles your body can dispose of.

My fourth session is next week. Shit doesn't want to come out.

[–] 2 pts

Jesus H. Christ on a cross! More fear porn bullshit. If you ever ate carrots and get cancer it was from the carrots! Chicken Littles jump on the bandwagon! Oy vey! We always knew tattoos were bad but nobody listened! This is NOT what we need to care about. The fucking world is collapsing and this is the latest distraction. Fuck it! It don’t mean nothing!

[–] 1 pt

At this point they might as well start telling us that staying under rain for too long will give us cold, so we should go and, uh... ban weather next? Those satanic fuckheads think they're funny and they're laughing.

[–] 1 pt

That makes some sense

[–] 1 pt

Been hearing this since the '70s.

[–] 1 pt

there's no regulations on tattoo ink, ink started off being all natural ingredients. todays inks can range from a basic list of ingredients where you know what everything is to wtf is this bs paragraph of ingredients.

ink choices for tattooing should rate high up with the sterilization of the process.

[–] 0 pt

What does the SDS say about injection?