Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

808

NO SHIT. We already know this. However, if the law abiding are allowed to carry anywhere it WOULD decrease homicides via DGU and the ones on the "dead" side will be almost entirely criminals.

Archive: https://archive.today/plyrb

From the post:

>Gun law restrictions have no impact on the rate of homicides between states, a study has shown. Researchers at Duke University compared gun laws across the US, including states with and without background checks, 'stand your ground' laws and safe storage requirements. They found there was no difference in homicide rates in states with or without firearm laws and restrictive access, a finding they said 'surprised' them.

NO SHIT. We already know this. However, if the law abiding are allowed to carry anywhere it WOULD decrease homicides via DGU and the ones on the "dead" side will be almost entirely criminals. Archive: https://archive.today/plyrb From the post: >>Gun law restrictions have no impact on the rate of homicides between states, a study has shown. Researchers at Duke University compared gun laws across the US, including states with and without background checks, 'stand your ground' laws and safe storage requirements. They found there was no difference in homicide rates in states with or without firearm laws and restrictive access, a finding they said 'surprised' them.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (5).
[–] • 3 pts

Of course Any 'gun restriction' is for only one reason, to disarm the honest citizen so the 'gov' can get away with what they are about to do. The Proof is of course history, AND The Fact that NO ONE is actually stupid enough to actually think that the Criminal/s have ever or will ever Care what 'restriction' is put on their stolen firearm.

[–] • 1 pt

Change 'gov' to 'jew' and it'll make sense