one study shows 19 percent archaic DNA in blacks not in whites or asians. another shows chimp DNA is 15 percent different than human. Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations [19 percent archaic DNA not found in asians or caucasians] 'While introgression from Neanderthals and Denisovans has been documented in modern humans outside Africa...Our results reveal the substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax5097 The 'Ghost' of an Unknown Extinct Human Has Been Found in DNA of Modern West Africans https://www.sciencealert.com/the-ghost-of-an-unknown-extinct-hominid-has-been-found-in-a-modern-human-genome New “Complete” Chimp Genome Shows 14.9 Percent Difference from Human Genome https://evolutionnews.org/2025/05/fact-check-new-complete-chimp-genome-shows-14-9-percent-difference-from-human-genome/ The Nacash Origin of the Black and Mixed Races https://media.christogenea.org/system/files/resources/BLACK-AND-MIXED-RACES-THE-NACHASH-ORIGIN_Lower-resolution.pdf Preadamites; or, A demonstration of the existence of men before Adam; together with a study of their condition, antiquity, racial affinities, and progressive dispersion over the earth The pre-Adamite view argues that blacks, particularly so-called “Negroes,” are not descended from Adam. This view appears to have its origin in the works of such authors as Paracelsus in 1520, Bruno in 1591, Vanini in 1619 and one of the most prolific writers, Peyrère, in 1655. It reached a high level of development with the 19th-century scholar Alexander Winchell in his book, Preadamites; or a Demonstration of the Existence of Men Before Adam, published in 1880. https://dn790009.ca.archive.org/0/items/preadamitesordem00winciala/preadamitesordem00winciala.pdf

What did I just watch?