WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

786

All of a sudden, Telegram bad! Ban Telegram! What about all of the far left Burn Loot Murder faggots that used facebook to coordinate firey but "mostly peaceful protests" where they murdered dozens of people, burned buildings down, looted and destroyed entire city blocks.. etc... They were literally domestic terrorists.

Archive: https://archive.today/YGYpW

From the post:

>The New York Times analyzed over 3.2 million Telegram messages from 16,220 channels. Their conclusion? Telegram "offers features that enable criminals, terrorists and grifters to organize at scale and to sidestep scrutiny from the authorities" — and that Telegram "has looked the other way as illegal and extremist activities have flourished openly on the app."

All of a sudden, Telegram bad! Ban Telegram! What about all of the far left Burn Loot Murder faggots that used facebook to coordinate firey but "mostly peaceful protests" where they murdered dozens of people, burned buildings down, looted and destroyed entire city blocks.. etc... They were literally domestic terrorists. Archive: https://archive.today/YGYpW From the post: >>The New York Times analyzed over 3.2 million Telegram messages from 16,220 channels. Their conclusion? Telegram "offers features that enable criminals, terrorists and grifters to organize at scale and to sidestep scrutiny from the authorities" — and that Telegram "has looked the other way as illegal and extremist activities have flourished openly on the app."
[–] 2 pts

TLDR: Jews dont control the narrative of whats being said on telegram. Therefor telegram is bad. We will point out how bad things are said on telegram, so we can convince the brainwashed goy that telegram is for criminals.

[–] 1 pt

The NYT 'description' of what Telegram 'offers' sounds exactly like Crime in NY City.