>I never said they were "all white" don't put words in my mouth I didn't. You said: >>actual stat wise they are Not true. >most are tho. your second link says im correct. No, it doesn't. Adjusting for population percentage, serial killers are a nigger thing. Or are you really suggesting that because white actual numbers are higher that it's a white thing? Despite the population of whites being many times larger than that of niggers as a whole? >you still didn't read my point, I wont reiterate. I stopped reading when you point to the white register, never trust an article that doesnt date it. Funny how you didn't provide any links, but somehow mine are not okay because they don't pass your muster. I'm just supposed to believe you when you say you "study" serial killers? You don't like a link? Fine. You're holding me to a standard you didn't hold yourself to, and that makes you a hypocrite. >According to the FBI, a serial killer is someone who commits at least three murders over more than a month with an emotional cooling off period in between. ... Strictly speaking, this gang member is a serial killer by the above definition, but he would not fit the common conception of what a serial killer is. Not interested in the common conception, because that is formed by the kikes in the media. >from your first link So, I was right. >you have to dive into what defines one, otherwise you could say most of chicago are serial killers So? I go by the legal definition. >this is a moot anyways, because many exist and active today, just look at missing persons forums. What is the purpose of bringing this up? Just some random factoid that doesn't prove you right? Some kind of hand-waving dismissal of my links because you say it's not important? >and none of your links cite sources to their information, or how they come to the conclusion. That's a lie. From my fourth link: >>According to a 2016 Radford University study, just 51.7 percent of all serial killers in America since 1900 have been white. It links the study. You're a liar, and a hypocrite now. >its a pdf sry, page 19, they a overwhelming 42% were shot of all thier "classified" serial killers method... no, that is not equate to a serial killer Is this supposed to be English? I'm not downloading a .pdf for you. >its how you define it. there is criminals and serial killers, serial killers are predators. They hunt. Legally. It's really simple. And what does that crap about "predators" and "They hunt" even mean? Do you think saying that lends weight to your argument, or makes you look legitimate in your argumentation here? It's a random, irrelevant, non-statistical factoid where numbers and statistics are the subject. You're wrong. You failed. Serial killers are niggers. If you're around an equal number of niggers and whites, you are nearly 5 times more likely to see a nigger serial killer than you are a white one. And that's just from one study, which you have not refuted with anything but a .pdf that no one in their right mind would download.