WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

413

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

But she never names who it was delivered and destroyed by.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

nor does she zoom in so we can see the labels.

for all we know its concrete at a building site.

what i did notice, is the same thing i see in every single 'totally real evidence of ufo's' videos that gets posted, keeps on moving the camera between things telling us what 'theyre looking at' but we dont actually see anything.

if youre gathering evidence, you zoom in on the object so the writing on it can be seen, then you keep the camera on the person doing the 'omg!' thing. THAT is video evidence.

This isnt.

[–] 0 pt

She can show a bill with product and number of packages.

[–] 0 pt

All that proves is that she has possession of a bill of lading. That doesn't mean it's hers or that what she's filming is what she says it is. This is why good journalism is hard. Any asshole from buttfuckistan with a cellphone and instagram is not a journalist.

[–] 0 pt

For all we know its contaminated product which should rightfully be destroyed.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah, was also gonna comment that. This is how contaminated product or past use by date is usually disposed of, or incinerated in a furnace if it's toxic/ non environment degradable. Would be unsurprised if there is also a bill/writ for disposal floating around also.