I'm starting to suspect they'll do the same thing they did in the Chauvin trial. Even though it was proven in court he was innocent and didn't do anything wrong, the jury convicted him falsely anyway. I'm thinking they might pull the same thing here, proved innocent in court but the jury convicts him anyway. The left is already threating the jury if he's not convicted.
They're using popular aggrandized cases like this to setup for a civil war. Instead of jury nullification, they're doing jury 'falsification?', or whatever you want to call the opposite.
I'm starting to suspect they'll do the same thing they did in the Chauvin trial. Even though it was proven in court he was innocent and didn't do anything wrong, the jury convicted him falsely anyway. I'm thinking they might pull the same thing here, proved innocent in court but the jury convicts him anyway. The left is already threating the jury if he's not convicted.
They're using popular aggrandized cases like this to setup for a civil war. Instead of jury nullification, they're doing jury 'falsification?', or whatever you want to call the opposite.
They're using popular aggrandized cases like this to setup for a civil war.
I sure hope so. A civil war would not go well for kikes or their nigger pets. Not at all.
>They're using popular aggrandized cases like this to setup for a civil war.
I sure hope so. A civil war would not go well for kikes or their nigger pets. Not at all.
(post is archived)