Kyle Rittenhouse Doesn’t Need Reasonable Doubt. His Prosecutors Do. In a weird turn of events, it’s lawyers for the state of Wisconsin who are the ones trying to argue that what’s seen on the surface is not what it seems.

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

•

Kyle Rittenhouse Doesn’t Need Reasonable Doubt. His Prosecutors Do. In a weird turn of events, it’s lawyers for the state of Wisconsin who are the ones trying to argue that what’s seen on the surface is not what it seems. (thefederalist.com)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (11).

[–] • 3 pts

I'm have never seen a prosecutor torpedo his own political career quite so well. Rioters not peaceful protesters? Legal gun that never crossed state lines? Running away and attacked while in retreat? Thanks state for the full defense!

link

[–] • 0 pt

Depends on who's nominating the prosecutor: The People or George Soros? In a lot of places, Soros nominates the prosecutor and voters just check a "D" box.

parent
link

/s/News

created ago

About this sub

This default sub is for "general news" (link posts only).

You have to provide a link/source to an article/archive (no more than a week old).

Keep the original title and add your commentary/opinion in the post's content.

No screenshots, images of texts, cartoons, memes...

For political stuff use:

(default sub)

or any other related subs such as: