Are we going to keep going around in circles like this? This is where I ask you what not being pacified looks like, you make veiled references to violence, I say let the people trained to be violent be violent, you back track and say you weren't actually talking about organized violence and then I say, "look we never needed violence, we needed civil disobedience and civic action, which people in the Q crowd have been calling for since the genisis of Q, going so far as to organize take overs of school boards and running for local offices, like Ron Watkins in AZ. "
Nothing is being offered to the Q crowds to placate them. They've been organizing non-violent responses for a couple of years now, you're just unhappy with the pace of change and you're growing impatient and demoralized because you can't stop watching the news and seeing /pol/ tier demoralization mechanisms that keep you in this mentally frail state where you can't breath underneath the weight of your disappointment, all because you expected the impossible.
There was a military coup. Don was the figured head for the public-facing side. Covert intelligence units have been operating for a few years now, trying to ensure the safe, steady and lasting nature of this transition. I understand it's taking forever. I totally agree. I want it to move faster too. We all do. But justice takes time. When it doesn't, it usually doesn't last. This stage we're in right now is about squeezing the last flips out of the lower rung guys so they can turn on the people above them and we can make this all the more concrete. The other crucial aspect of this operation is letting the masses of average citizens get the idea implanted in their minds that what's been happening the last decade, especially the last two years, shouldn't happen again. The best way to do that is to allow them to be crushed repeatedly by the boot of commies. It's like when your grandpa held your hand over a candle when you were nine. No, it wasn't because he's cruel and wants to hurt you; instead, he's teaching you what to avoid and showing you the cost of not avoiding things that will inevitably hurt you.
Things are worse than they appear and that's on purpose. Children are being saved in droves. There are grand juries convening to indict criminal syndicates. Legal avenues are being addressed. People are getting pressed to flip on their controllers. You just don't see it. Not yet.
you make veiled references to violence
I have done no such thing glowfag.
and then I say, "look we never needed violence, we needed civil disobedience and civic action
All I've been calling for.
Things are worse than they appear and that's on purpose.
Q: Just another ARG larp by the berkley crowd and MIT technocrats sucking israeli and british GCHQ cock.
Are we going to keep going around in circles like this? This is where I ask you what not being pacified looks like, you make veiled references to violence, I say let the people trained to be violent be violent, you back track and say you weren't actually talking about organized violence and then I say, "look we never needed violence, we needed civil disobedience and civic action, which people in the Q crowd have been calling for since the genisis of Q, going so far as to organize take overs of school boards and running for local offices, like Ron Watkins in AZ. "
Are we going to keep going around in circles like this?
This is where I ask you what being pacified looks like (it looks like "trust the plan" instead of civil disobedience), and you make veiled references explicit accusations of people suggesting violence every time someone questions you.
You know what reaction formation is?
Of course you do. And you can be indicted for promoting it.
Of course you do. And you can be indicted for promoting it.
kek what are you even on about now?...
I'm not accusing you of calling for violence. I'm outlining how each and every one of these conversations goes and you've still managed to do exactly what I've outlined. No, I don't want you to be violent, even if you just keep reverse psychologying me. The Q crowds have been droning on and on about going to school board meetings and civil disobedience for years, man. You're fighting a strawman with a mirror here. Q and anons have never suggested not to be disobedient. There is no placation routine. You're suggesting there is and then suggesting that the masses should do exactly what Q and anons have already been suggesting they do for years. It's like you're purposefully going around in circles, even after I outlined exactly how this would play out.
Q is actually a covert military intelligence operation. I'm not sure why people saying this makes you so uncomfortable, despite your cynicism shtick.
This is where I ask you what being pacified looks like (it looks like "trust the plan" instead of civil disobedience), and you make veiled references explicit accusations of people suggesting violence every time someone questions you.
That's because that's what you guys want. What else could you possibly mean? You keep talking about how the idea is to pacify people, but you always end up agreeing that not being pacified looks exactly the same as what Q and anons are suggesting. So which is it, do you agree with Q and anons or are you promoting violence? You can't have your cake and eat it too.
This isn't me falling back on accusations that should get people in trouble, this is me pointing out that we're suggesting we do the same exact thing, but you're repeating some jargon about how Q and anons are placating. I'm not sure what else you could possibly mean.
but you always end up agreeing that not being pacified looks exactly the same as what Q and anons are suggesting.
WRONG. Nice try putting words in my mouth bud. I said Q is what it looks like when a government tries to pacify its populace.
I'm not accusing you of calling for violence
Actually, you were dickhead. Thats exactly what you were insinuating.
(post is archived)