Just so were clear on the sequence of events:
- Assange was accused of a type of sexual assault in Sweden where rapist get to rape women
- Assange refuses extredition and hides in the Ecuadorian embassy. He states the allegations for him are false and it is only a ruse to get him into Sweden so he can be extradited to the US.
- The charges in Sweden timed out and the prosecutors have since dropped it.
- Assange is still being held so that he can be extradited to the US.
How does this not prove he was right all along? The US got some bitch to accuse Assange of something minor in order to extradite him from Sweden. Why isn't Anna Ardin being tried for being the lying whore that she is?
Just so were clear on the sequence of events:
1. Assange was accused of a type of sexual assault in Sweden where rapist get [paid](https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2021/08/15/sweden-forced-to-pay-rapist-migrant-70k-96k-for-trying-him-as-adult/) to rape women
2. Assange refuses extredition and hides in the Ecuadorian embassy. He states the allegations for him are false and it is only a ruse to get him into Sweden so he can be extradited to the US.
3. The charges in Sweden timed out and the prosecutors have since dropped it.
4. Assange is still being held so that he can be extradited to the US.
How does this not prove he was right all along? The US got some bitch to accuse Assange of something minor in order to extradite him from Sweden. Why isn't Anna Ardin being tried for being the lying whore that she is?
(post is archived)