WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

Looks like the prosecution knows it has a weak case and is flailing like a drowning man.

[–] 4 pts

I hope Rittenhouse sues the shit out of the state.

[–] 0 pt

The case against Chauvin was also pretty weak.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

A big difference is that Rittenhouse has competent lawyers and a judge that's isn't trying to make an example out of him. Earlier pre-trial recordings have shown the judge bitching out the DAs for the political stunts they keep trying to pull. Here is a good example.

https://youtu.be/mfN8CNuGuDI

[–] 0 pt

You seem to think the jury tried to judge the Chauvin case on its merits, and that's why it went that way. They gave a guilty verdict to everything he was charged with, even though murder would preclude manslaughter, they convicted him of both anyway.

No jury is going to give a shit about what's presented to them in this case if they have to fear for their lives after the trial is over.

[–] 0 pt

Yes it was weak but there was muh oppressed negro with Chauvin which is fortunately missing from the Rittenhouse case so it has not become a BLM lightning rod. No one is worried about pedos and jews rioting if Rittenhouse is found not guilty.

[–] 0 pt

The only thing the jury cares about is fearing for their life after the trial if they give the "wrong" verdict. The rest is just noise.