Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

860

(post is archived)

[–] • 13 pts

Jewish terrorists.

[–] • 3 pts

Is there any other kind lol

[–] • 2 pts

Brother Nathaniel, Eric Clopper, and Bobby Fischer and Sam Hyde.

Unless of course you want to argue that they are controlled agents acting as “friendlies”.

[–] • 1 pt

If Br Nathanial is controlled, it's a hell of a trick.

[–] • 8 pts

I linked to the hearing yesterday and in it the Judge tears the DA apart near the end. It's amazing.

[–] • 6 pts

Looks like the prosecution knows it has a weak case and is flailing like a drowning man.

[–] • 4 pts

I hope Rittenhouse sues the shit out of the state.

[–] • 0 pt

The case against Chauvin was also pretty weak.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

A big difference is that Rittenhouse has competent lawyers and a judge that's isn't trying to make an example out of him. Earlier pre-trial recordings have shown the judge bitching out the DAs for the political stunts they keep trying to pull. Here is a good example.

https://youtu.be/mfN8CNuGuDI

[–] • 0 pt

You seem to think the jury tried to judge the Chauvin case on its merits, and that's why it went that way. They gave a guilty verdict to everything he was charged with, even though murder would preclude manslaughter, they convicted him of both anyway.

No jury is going to give a shit about what's presented to them in this case if they have to fear for their lives after the trial is over.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes it was weak but there was muh oppressed negro with Chauvin which is fortunately missing from the Rittenhouse case so it has not become a BLM lightning rod. No one is worried about pedos and jews rioting if Rittenhouse is found not guilty.

[–] • 0 pt

The only thing the jury cares about is fearing for their life after the trial if they give the "wrong" verdict. The rest is just noise.

[–] • 5 pts

What is going to be interesting is if Rittenhouse is acquitted not on merit of self defense but on merit of shooting an active community threat.

That might set some useful precedent.

[–] • 1 pt

The state will never do such a thing. Now, a Kickstart to fund a parade/annuity for him or similar.......

[–] • 0 pt

It's called "citizens execution" and part of common law.

[–] • 3 pts

GOD BLESS KYLE!!!!

BRAVEST KID ON EARTH!!

[–] • 2 pts

Dis' nigga ain't goin' to jail.

[–] • 2 pts

They are not victims any more than a guy who gets killed while raping or robbing someone is. The judge got this one right.

[–] • 1 pt

I'll be honest; I don't understand the poal outrage. They are to be referred to by last name, rather than as any of the above terms. Seems like a reasonable way to be specific about what happened and not biased. If the facts come out as we all understand them, this is a case of self defense regardless of what you call the guys who got shot.

Now, the prosecution is TRYING to exclude evidence about cops handing out water and atta-boys to business defenders. That is BS and prosecution should not be allowed to exclude that. No report thus far that they will be successful at excluding evidence. The thing about an adversarial justice system is that prosecutors aren't charged with fairness. They're supposed to try to get a conviction, and dirty legal maneuvers are part of how they do that.

[–] • 0 pt

Well the judge has spoken and they can include the police hat tip moment. Same goes for the arson and rioting.

[–] • 1 pt

defeated combatants

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 1 pt

'A convicted serial child rapist and his accomplices' would also be accurate.

[–] • 0 pt

"Just arson? Come on!"

The Judge is based.

Load more (1 reply)