Epstein didn't kill himself.
Epstein didn't kill himself.
Epstein isnt dead
Epstein isnt dead
Someone brought a real and loaded gun to a movie set, it somehow got mixed in with the props, the handler didn't check it properly before it was handed to Alec, and he pointed it at the head of someone who is not in the movie, and pulled the trigger. Mistakes were made. No big deal.
There's nothing to see here. However, the evil neo-nazi KKK white supremacists from the horrific Charlottesville riot go on trial tomorrow.
Someone brought a real and loaded gun to a movie set, it somehow got mixed in with the props, the handler didn't check it properly before it was handed to Alec, and he pointed it at the head of someone who is not in the movie, and pulled the trigger. Mistakes were made. No big deal.
There's nothing to see here. However, the evil neo-nazi KKK white supremacists from the horrific Charlottesville riot go on trial tomorrow. [Let's look at that instead.](https://archive.ph/rQ1di)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/celebrity/the-head-armorer-of-rust-once-gave-an-11-year-old-actress-a-gun-without-checking-it-properly-the-daily-beast-reports/ar-AAPTBPm?ocid=msedgntp
But he is 'white' all whites kill, unless you are black, then guns kill!
But he is 'white' all whites kill, unless you are black, then guns kill!
Have you ever caused an accident? Whether it was your negligence or not, if feels horrible. He didn't mean to kill her. He was doing a shot which required him to point the gun at the camera and fire. It was an accident.
Have you ever caused an accident? Whether it was your negligence or not, if feels horrible. He didn't mean to kill her. He was doing a shot which required him to point the gun at the camera and fire. It was an accident.
Ah... ok. That makes sense.
Ah... ok. That makes sense.
You've obviously never taken a gun safety class. He is guilty of negligent homicide because he had a responsibility to know if there was live ammo in the gun before pointing it at someone and pulling the trigger. Because he is a rich pampered star, he is used to shifting responsibilities to his paid servants. In this case, his servant was a ditzy 24 year old girl who was incompetent. However as the producer, he hired her so he is doubly responsible for her incompetence.
You've obviously never taken a gun safety class. He is guilty of negligent homicide because he had a responsibility to know if there was live ammo in the gun before pointing it at someone and pulling the trigger. Because he is a rich pampered star, he is used to shifting responsibilities to his paid servants. In this case, his servant was a ditzy 24 year old girl who was incompetent. However as the producer, he hired her so he is doubly responsible for her incompetence.
I have taken many gun safety courses. I am perfectly aware of his liability. However, he will never be convicted. Not because of his status, but because of these simple facts; As an actor; How many times during the coarse of filming do you think a led actor fires a gun? In some movies its hundreds or even thousands of times. He was responsible for checking his gun every single time that is true UNLESS the production hires someone else to perform that duty for him which they had. When he was handed the gun he was told by his assistant directed the gun was "cold" meaning loaded with blanks. That alleviated his liability was a performer. Now for this scene which requires the gun to be pointed directly at the camera it should have been double and triple checked, but how many times had they filmed that scene? How many takes? Also, it is possible he was set up. There are stranger things in Hollywood. The weapons master's father was a known Satanist. We don't really know what happened.
As a producer, he is protected by the limited liability of the executive. They would have to prove extreme negligence to pierce the corporate veil. They can't do that here unless he was the one who directly hired the weapons master. Even then it would be tough.
However, the production will have to pay for the civil liability to the tune of tens of millions, but insurance will likely cover that.
I have taken many gun safety courses. I am perfectly aware of his liability. However, he will never be convicted. Not because of his status, but because of these simple facts;
As an actor;
How many times during the coarse of filming do you think a led actor fires a gun? In some movies its hundreds or even thousands of times. He was responsible for checking his gun every single time that is true UNLESS the production hires someone else to perform that duty for him which they had. When he was handed the gun he was told by his assistant directed the gun was "cold" meaning loaded with blanks. That alleviated his liability was a performer. Now for this scene which requires the gun to be pointed directly at the camera it should have been double and triple checked, but how many times had they filmed that scene? How many takes? Also, it is possible he was set up. There are stranger things in Hollywood. The weapons master's father was a known Satanist. We don't really know what happened.
As a producer, he is protected by the limited liability of the executive. They would have to prove extreme negligence to pierce the corporate veil. They can't do that here unless he was the one who directly hired the weapons master. Even then it would be tough.
However, the production will have to pay for the civil liability to the tune of tens of millions, but insurance will likely cover that.
I've heard that they were told to do the scene again. At this point, he pointed the weapon at the director and fired.
It is clear to me, no one on that set should have been handling a weapon.
I've heard that they were told to do the scene again. At this point, he pointed the weapon at the director and fired.
It is clear to me, no one on that set should have been handling a weapon.
Is this movie about the video game of the same name? Like, a post-apocalyptic landscape filled with maniacal Macguyvers hastily crafting crossbows on their portable tool benches?
Is this movie about the video game of the same name? Like, a post-apocalyptic landscape filled with maniacal Macguyvers hastily crafting crossbows on their portable tool benches?
Absolutely they will spin this whatever way needed to clear Baldwin of fault.
Absolutely they will spin this whatever way needed to clear Baldwin of fault.
camera woman had dirt on the Clintons
camera woman had dirt on the Clintons
Who’s finger was on the trigger?
Who’s finger was on the trigger?
Dude, it was an accident, as is telling us here in the comments to believe.
And of course, no one is responsible if it's an accident.
Dude, it was an accident, as @Orion is telling us here in the comments to believe.
And of course, no one is responsible if it's an accident.
I'd say 99.999% you're being tongue in cheek with your original post, and this one here, but just to really hammer things home for the people saying "gun's fault", or "a accident", is somebody willing to list Gun Safety Rules #1 & #2 please.
I'd say 99.999% you're being tongue in cheek with your original post, and this one here, but just to really hammer things home for the people saying "gun's fault", or "a accident", is somebody willing to list Gun Safety Rules #1 & #2 please.
He may get a pass by the legal system but she is dead and he pulled the trigger. he's poisonous now. game over.
He may get a pass by the legal system but she is dead and he pulled the trigger. he's poisonous now. game over.
the handler didn't check it properly before it was handed to Alec
Why in the fuck would this happen? One job and EVERYONE who takes on this job takes it seriously.
ALEC NEEDS TO ROT AND DIE AND JAIL!
> the handler didn't check it properly before it was handed to Alec
Why in the fuck would this happen? One job and EVERYONE who takes on this job takes it seriously.
ALEC NEEDS TO ROT AND DIE AND JAIL!
Surely not the replacement on site Head Armorer that is on a podcast saying "... the scariest part is loading blanks into the prop guns". The fact that loading blanks into a prop-gun is scary for her, leads me to believe this cunt doesn't even own a gun, let alone having ever fired a real one.
Surely not the replacement on site Head Armorer that is on a podcast saying "... the scariest part is loading blanks into the prop guns".
The fact that loading blanks into a prop-gun is scary for her, leads me to believe this cunt doesn't even own a gun, let alone having ever fired a real one.
it was the gun
Never say those words. Ever again. kikes want you to.
It was the head armorer.
Yes. That's become evident and is very telling. He's also been on another movie set with a gun death.
>it was the gun
Never say those words.
Ever again.
kikes want you to.
>It was the head armorer.
Yes. That's become evident and is very telling. He's also been on another movie set with a gun death.
(post is archived)