Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

I can't help but laugh at this one.

I can't help but laugh at this one.

(post is archived)

[–] • 11 pts

Remember kids, since this was a movie set they almost certainly filmed this shooting with high resolution cameras, possibly from several angels.

Now place your bets on how many seconds it took them to "accidentally destroy" that footage.

[–] • 5 pts

About as long as the Epstein footage lasted?

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Shots from angels would be cool, but they probably went with the budget option and used drones or helicopters.

[–] • 1 pt

Now listen here you little shit...

lol

[–] • 7 pts

So, when you give a jackass a firearm on a movie set, it magically becomes an innocent prop gun? That prick needs to be charged with involuntary manslaughter. If someone hands you a firearm you don't assume anything other than it's loaded and deadly until after you verify its status. Negligence and improper handling led to death, and it's ultimately that libtard's fault.

[–] • 6 pts

I wonder if he was on the set of The Crow, and had a grudge against Brandon Lee.

[–] • 6 pts

Anti gunner uses gun to make money. Fuck him.

[–] • 5 pts

oh no, anyway. I predict they will give him a slap on the wrist even they are rabid anti gun nuts.

[–] • 4 pts

Well he is old and it will hang over him like a dark cloud for the rest of his miserable life so it won't all be for naught.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

I just learned some guy in a band killed a guy driving a couple years ago. Was apparently drunk or high or something. Said his eyes were real Red. Nothing happened to him.

[–] • 4 pts

After Brandon Lee died from the same thing, there were safety measures that were put in place (that probably only apply in California) when using any kind of gun on a set. One of them, I believe, is having bulletproof glass between the gun and target (in case something was lodged in the gun, it could be fired by blank just like a bullet). I'll bet these safety measures were not followed.

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

He's also a producer of the film, which means he might be liable in that regard, too.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Considering that multiple people were hit I don't think it was just a squib round. It was a revolver loaded with live rounds instead of blanks.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts (edited )

Let's assume that he didn't know that the gun was real.

Why did he point a "prop gun" at the "director of photography?" and pull the trigger.

Then somehow, someone else was also hit bad enough to be critically injured? Did he pull the trigger twice?

The accident part doesn't even make sense.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

A 'prop gun' is a real gun with a blank firing adapter and blank ammunition.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

OK, I have no experience with blanks.

That makes it even more baffling IMO.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I guess TDS made him go a little loopy. Too bad someone died, but I have to believe there is a little karma being applied here.

[–] • 2 pts

Rule #1: All guns are always loaded. Even when they're not, they are.

[–] • 2 pts

> multiple people hit

> gun was loaded with blanks

Sounds like someone didn’t understand what blanks are and “pretended” to shoot multiple people at close range

[–] • 1 pt

The title makes it sound like he intentionally shot them

[–] • 4 pts

No it doesn't.

[–] • -1 pt

Yes it does

[–] • 1 pt

If you think that then you're a moron.

[–] • 0 pt

Hey moron. So it sounds like it might be likely that he killed her intentionally. Should I update the title to reflect that do you think?

[–] • 0 pt

Hey faggot. Why do you still care?

[–] • 0 pt

Because I think it's hilarious what a muppet you are and enjoy bringing it to your attention. So what do you think?

Load more (10 replies)