That's strange because in most states firing a whistleblower is an automatic win in court for the whistleblower. I mean officially. A detrimental job action that takes place shortly after a whistleblower's actions is presumed by law to be retaliation. The employer will have the burden of proof in court to prove that it wasn't.
That's strange because in most states firing a whistleblower is an automatic win in court for the whistleblower. I mean officially. A detrimental job action that takes place shortly after a whistleblower's actions is presumed by law to be retaliation. The employer will have the burden of proof in court to prove that it wasn't.
(post is archived)