WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

477

(post is archived)

[–] 11 pts (edited )

This wasn't an accident. Most likely it was a staged event to see how to implement the kill switch or a distraction.

Either way, don't think (((big cloud))) is reliable. It fails just like everything else. And when it does, it's much more spectacular.

[–] 13 pts

Either way, don't think (((big cloud))) is reliable. It fails just like everything else.

I keep reminding people that "the cloud" they're paying for is just someone else's servers and storage.

[–] 8 pts

Not only that, you're giving a hostile enemy access to all of your data. Just so people know, Azure (bill gates) cloud, is the most attacked infrastructure in the world. It's only a matter of time before it is breached in a big way.

[–] 9 pts

Oh, hell yeah. The bigger the target the more people who go after it.

[–] 6 pts

See cloud security companies based wholly or partially in Israel. They have access to very sensitive information on how to exploit your systems and most major companies use companies like this.

[–] 2 pts

The only reliable benefit is that it's offsite, to protect against local catastrophe.

[–] 1 pt

The only reliable benefit is that it's offsite, to protect against local catastrophe.

Which is why cloud backup should only be a part of a company's backup / storage strategy.

[–] 0 pt

Their servers and storage, their control of the data stored into them.

[–] 1 pt

Ok but the problem in this case is a FB actually ru ning their own shit