>Irmgard Furchner, 96, was a typist at the Stutthof concentration camp in Nazi-occupied Germany and faces charges of more than 11,000 counts of accessory to murder.
Please explain to me the validity of the indictment.. a 18 yo. secretary being accessory to 11.000 (alledged) murders.. (((we know how and by whom those deaths were counted!)))
Did Harvey Weinsteins secretary/company get indicted with accessory to statutory rape?
Was U-haul accessory to murder in the oclahomo city bombing?
Rkellys record company? Michael Jacksons monkey? Ariana Grandes designer?
FTW!
Irmgard Furchner did nothing wrong.
Meanwhile the pilots and gunboat crews that knowingly and willfully, shot up, rocketed, bombed and torpedoed the USS Liberty, and her lifeboats, killing her US crewmembers and tried their level best to sink her, unsuccessfully, have never been charged with anything.
Funny how, in the midst of all of their moralizing, you never hear even one story about any of them refusing any of the repeated orders to fire on a clearly US flagged vessel belonging their "greatest ally".
Not. One. Ever.
How about this: Locate an old jew who was an 18 year old clerk/typist for the israeli MOD on 8 June 1967 and charge them with 34 counts of accessory to murder.
Better yet; kidnap the fucker, fly it halfway around the world, military court, death penalty, execute..
US military history is replete with examples of men risking everything to refuse what they knew were unlawful orders based on their basic sense of decency, compassion, and knowing right from wrong.
In all that I have read and researched about the jew's attack on the USS Liberty, I have never once come across any record, account, comment, or even an anecdote about any of the jews in the cockpit, commanding the gunboats, or just the guy on the trigger that day, refusing the orders to fire on Americans. Even after they asked, and it was confirmed by their own chain of command that, yes, it was in fact, a US Navy ship. They all fired. None refused. Not one.
From the top, all the way down, they treated the Americans that day the same as they treated the Arabs, and the Egyptians, and the Syrians. As enemies to be killed. That's what they think of us. All I'm asking is that we simply return the sentiment. Ounce for ounce.
Maybe you can explain the logic to me? I don't follow. How is a secretary be an accessory to anything?
I asked first..
It's outrageous!
(post is archived)