That's a very good article.
If your risk of getting covid is only .88% without a vaccine and it reduces your risk to .04% then it actually reduces your chances of getting covid by only .84%.
That's an interesting statistic.
However it guarantees you of having a risk or exposure to the spike protein since it instructs your body to make the spike protein although slightly modified.
What the article doesn't say, and correct me if I am wrong, And since the spike is damaging it really increases your chance of exposure to the spike protein 100x (.88% to 100% after the shot).
And while the article talks about fraud in the Pfizer study it doesnt go into it much except to say that It appears that the researchers knew who had gotten the shot and who hadn't during the study since they pulled data from those who had gotten it 5x as often. This means they would have been subject to profit pressure to interpreter or modify or exclude data from the ones the knew had gotten the shot. And we know those pressures are extraordinary in for profit pharma companies.
Very good article.
risk of getting covid is only .88% without a vaccine
This doesn't sound right. Do you mean being hospitalized with it? That'd sound somewhere in the right ballpark. If the risk of infection was .88% its replication rate would be so low as to qualify as a rounding error.
All vaccines guarantee you a risk of exposure to the pathogen, otherwise no vaccine would work.
(post is archived)