WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 17 pts

His conviction was a crime.

Who is prosecuting the jurors judges media and lawyers? Or are they waiting to be persecuted?

[–] 14 pts

I've been calling this out for a long time: ONE OF OUR BIGGEST PROBLEMS IS OUR COURT SYSTEM.

Judges and prosecutors are untouchable.

The vast majority (~90%) of niggers who get blown away by cops were on parole or probation. Example: Alton Sterling, the nigger from Kenosha. He was 27 years old, had been convicted of about a dozen felonies and SENTENCED FOR A TOTAL OF 31 YEARS. But for some reason, he was not in prison that night- he was out of prison, able to get drunk, steal a car and drive it to Wendy's and pass out. Cops show up, he chimps out because he doesn't want to go back to jail, snatches and tries to use a taser on the cops and gets shot a few times.

Then there are riots nationwide. This led to Kyle Rittenhouse's dilemma. People were killed/maimed, billions of dollars in damages... for what? Alton Sterling, WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN PRISON FOR LONGER THAN HE WAS ALIVE AT THIS POINT. But a parole board or a judge had this MENACE presented to him, his massive rap sheet, and made a decision: "Let's give him a 47th chance at being a good citizen, let him out."

In cases like this, where the convict is an OBVIOUS MENACE, where it is objective that this guy is a danger to everything and everyone around him, if he is released and inevitably does something.... the assholes who set him free should be held accountable. If judges were worried about losing their job or prison time for releasing objectively monstrous crareer criminals LONG BEFORE THEIR SENTENCE IS UP, they might be a little more careful. They might actually be serious about rehabilitating criminals. But instead, they let them out, dozens of peopl die, lives are ruined, and the judge just shrugs and says "He said he was going to be a good boy this time and I believed him." Well judge, that makes you either incompetent or malicious.

[–] 5 pts

>Who is prosecuting the jurors judges media and lawyers?

Same people who are prosecuting hordes of wild burning-looting nigger monkeys

[–] 2 pts

tbf jury nullification is a legitimate thing. the judges media and lawyers i agree but never the jurors, they are compelled to be there anyways. if anything whoever stacked the jury should be the one facing charges not the jury itself

[–] 4 pts

It was a setup and they were party to it.

If they are innocent let God break the branches above them

[–] 2 pts

The question isn’t who is prosecuting them, but why are people waiting to punish them? In the past, the public took care of the people that escaped the justice system. Lynchings were the public’s answer to a failed justice system. People didn’t just sit around and complain about the politicians and the judges and the prosecutors that acted outside of the law, they handled them

[–] 2 pts

We lost our power before we were even born. We relinquished it to the few and then the Enemy simply infiltrated and subverted the few.

[–] 2 pts

No, that’s defeatist bullshit. You have as much power to handle an outlaw as anyone did 100 years ago, you’re just afraid to exercise it