Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

wanted to go with a line of attack that would imply a racial element in the shooting.

They really are angry he shot three jews.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

They are trying to label a hispanic who shot three white men a white supremacist.

[–] • 0 pt

Not white at all. 3 kikes, all with criminal backgrounds, including a convicted pedophile who raped young boys.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I know they're jews, you know they're jews, but the people calling Rittenhouse a white supremacist think the three people he shot were white. That's what makes it so ridiculous.

[–] • 2 pts

Not surprising, lots of jews are white supremacists according to Hollywood, and better at being white supremacists than white people. That’s what the film True Believer is about.

[–] • 1 pt

If you are a white man and don't cuck, you are a white supremacist.

[–] • 0 pt

I don't even understand this angle of attack. What do they gain by linking him to Proud Boys? The video we all saw is pretty clear cut, are you only allowed to defend yourself if you're a member of the Church of Progress in good standing?

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

as if it even matters whether or not he is a commie, a nazi or a fucking conservative or libertarian.

Everyone has a right to self defense.

[–] • 1 pt

Came here to say this. What's on trial, his actions or his opinions?

[–] • 0 pt

incidental unplanned meeting between groups of people should be allowed toe be used

Watch the hearing. The prosecutor isn't jewish that I know of but he is basically a jew.