WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

893

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

The irony is that the Delta variant still hasn't killed anyone in NZ yet, so the vaccine is more deadly so far

[–] 2 pts

If you buy into this delta bs.

Call me skeptical but given thousands of variants exist the certainty that only one is spreading within nz is bs.

Nevermind the timing coinciding with world events and Cindy's sudden drop in popular support.

Their cause is just, therefore no sacrifice is too great, like back when they burned heretics at the stake.

[–] 0 pt

or locked up Galileo because he said the earth revolved around the sun, or how about thalidomide and what it did to so many infants

[–] 1 pt

The CDC held public meetings yesterday to discuss how the jab increases periocarditis rates by 20-200x. Sounds like NZ is acknowledging the obvious.

If they closed the whole country over one f-ing "case" what does this mean for the shot? Are they going to execute the Pfizer CEO? That would be approximately the same magnitude of response.

(No, no, they won't.)

[–] 0 pt

Well we’re going to have to kill these fucking team and Jews because they’re not gonna stop Jewish ritual murder needle that the Jewish doctors are getting thousands to murder 10 and 20 .They are demons using a lab coat in order to murder people gates needs to die Fauci needs to die Rothschild and Rockefeller is in Kissinger and any politician that’s pushing this murder needle paper which includes macron and Trudeau and Merkel and just center and Boris and Biden any politician that pushes this needle any doctor or nurse do you notice they are Jewish

According to these numbers (which I assume are underreported), at 20 cases per 1M doses, a person aged 18-24 has a 1 in 50k chance of myocarditis every time they get a mRNA shot. I think we can assume that the risk of pericarditis is similar, so with two doses, a young adult has a 1 in 12,5k chance of having potentially lethal heart inflammation. We are told the risk decreases with age, meaning the risk increases even further for children? Heart inflammation is only one possible side effect, there are other known ones as well as ones that are yet to be discovered, as it would take 8-12 years of clinical trials for a complete risk assessment. Despite this, they claim "the benefits outweigh the risks". How can this be true for healthy adults? For children? The risk of serious illness from this virus is already minuscule, the shots cannot reduce it in any statistically significant manner. They are violating non-malfeasance principles.

Defenestration.

[–] 0 pt

they want everyone to get boosters now. Israel most have 3

[–] 0 pt

Yeah could be just lies the jew in there lies but if it’s the case then lesss jews on the planet would be a very good thing seb because we’ve been trying to kill these things with numerous times in history because of the Jewish ritual murder which is now the murder needle

[–] 0 pt

I miss when medicine used to be apolitical and scientific... maybe likely kinda? Give me the degree of confidence and relevant statistics...

[–] 0 pt

That people are dying of the jab just shows that it's working.... right?

</s>

[–] 0 pt

No actually the fact that you have to take another one means that the first one doesn’t work and everyone knows it it’s poison now aluminum mercury barium and aborted baby cells And graphine Also people have been reporting to have a number like barcode and that’s Patend by the Roth child the demon Jews needs to die