The FDA is aiming to give full approval to Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine on Monday, according to people familiar with the agency’s planning. The move is expected to pave the way for a series of vaccine mandates.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

No mention of long term (5+ year) side effects

Nice goal post move. They passed Phase III trials with flying colors. Almost all drugs have more side effects than these vaccines. Almost ALL.

Regardless, since you don't know how the process works, almost NO drugs are required to go through a 5+ year testing period with the FDA.

https://medshadow.org/what-are-long-term-effects-of-medicine/

"For those and other reasons, the FDA generally does not require testing for long-term effects on drugs before approval for use. When reviewing the research before approval, if the FDA feels more research in needed for side- and long-term effects, the FDA can require the pharmaceutical company to test further and still approve the drug for immediate use. A drug may have a different effect in the general population than it had in trials."

You retarded fuckers will pursue ANY avenue to avoid the obvious truth - the vaccines are remarkably safe. The conspiracies you SHOULD be pursuing is the corruption behind who got funding to make the vaccines.

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

You retarded fuckers will pursue ANY avenue to avoid the obvious truth - the vaccines are remarkably safe. The conspiracies you SHOULD be pursuing is the corruption behind who got funding to make the vaccines.

"During July 2021, 469 cases of COVID-19 associated with multiple summer events and large public gatherings in a town in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, were identified among Massachusetts residents; vaccination coverage among eligible Massachusetts residents was 69%. Approximately three quarters (346; 74%) of cases occurred in fully vaccinated persons (those who had completed a 2-dose course of mRNA vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna] or had received a single dose of Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vaccine ≥14 days before exposure)." https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w

Real world results show you and your vax are about as effective as water you fucking retard.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

"During July 2021, 469 cases of COVID-19 associated with multiple summer events and large public gatherings in a town in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, were identified among Massachusetts residents; vaccination coverage among eligible Massachusetts residents was 69%. Approximately three quarters (346; 74%) of cases occurred in fully vaccinated persons (those who had completed a 2-dose course of mRNA vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna] or had received a single dose of Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vaccine ≥14 days before exposure)." https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w

Real world results show you and your vax are about as effective as water you fucking retard.

You're an idiot that has no idea how science actually works. That study does not say anything at all about vaccine efficacy. How many had symptoms from that vaccine group. How many were hospitalized from the vaccine group. How many died. Then compare all those figures to a control that did not get vaccinated. If there is a difference, is a statistically significant?

We have the answer already:

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-health-941fcf43d9731c76c16e7354f5d5e187

"... data from May shows that “breakthrough” infections in fully vaccinated people accounted for fewer than 1,200 of more than 107,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations. That’s about 1.1%.

...

And only about 150 of the more than 18,000 COVID-19 deaths in May were in fully vaccinated people. That translates to about 0.8%, or five deaths per day on average."

So there's your data. There's your answer.