That’s not entirely true; they are just using a different marker sequence of RNA. They admit that when the original tests were propagated, a sample was unavailable so the RNA sequence was basically just theoretical extrapolation.
Of course this implies that now they have a sequenced, pure sample of the “coronavirus,” which is also highly dubious.
That’s not entirely true; they are just using a different marker sequence of RNA. They admit that when the original tests were propagated, a sample was unavailable so the RNA sequence was basically just theoretical extrapolation.
Of course this implies that now they have a sequenced, pure sample of the “coronavirus,” which is also highly dubious.
Sorry, I was just going by the words of the inverter of the PCR test ; Kary Mullis. The PCR test does work but not with the way they are using it. something about the cycles being too many. I'm no Fauci so I don't pretend to be an authority on Covid.
Sorry, I was just going by the words of the inverter of the PCR test ; Kary Mullis. The PCR test does work but not with the way they are using it. something about the cycles being too many. I'm no Fauci so I don't pretend to be an authority on Covid.
The isolated sample needs to be published and interrogated before it can be taken seriously
The isolated sample needs to be published and interrogated before it can be taken seriously
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=180933
(post is archived)