Pfizer’s trial data showed no efficacy of the vaccine for those with evidence of prior infection. FDA published this 8 months ago. The political scientists at CDC are trying to show otherwise by contriving studies that FDA would laugh out of the room if presented for approval!

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

[–] • 1 pt

(edited )

Rep Thomas Massie in a reply on there: "I talked to the CDC today (they were very polite and responsive) and they said I was correct and they will issue a fix to the document."

Um... am I reading his comment correctly? They confirmed for him that he was correct and then stated that they were going to alter the truthful statement in the document that he caught to instead be 'corrected' to be a lie that goes with their false narrative...and he stated this like it was a good thing.

"Phew! Don't worry, folks, they said they will correct that bit of truth I noticed that somehow got printed in that document to properly be a lie that fits their false narrative so there's nothing to worry about!"

Ah, perhaps this was the statement the CDC said they would correct so that it no longer says 92%:

"Does this document claim the Pfizer vaccine is 92% efficacious for those who previously had a SARS-CoV-2 infection? If so, where can we find the supporting data? To make this assertion, wouldn’t the placebo group have to contain evidence of symptomatic reinfection?"

link