WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

279

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

IF we can sue manufacturers for their products then can I sue the pharmaceutical companies now? Asking for a friend.

[–] 1 pt

I am thinking along the same lines. If they can sue gun manufacturers we can sue pharma companies, tech companies, etc. Play their own game.

[–] 0 pt

This is going to need a big war chest... someone call James O'keffe. Lets gat that rich hibe in on this shit.

[–] 3 pts

If the citizens of Mexico were well armed the cartels would not Own Mexico. It is amusing that they can ignore the the crimes of the Illegally armed drug dealers and 'blame' a piece of metal for their crimes. The question they must answer is, are you going to sue Ford for drunk drivers killing people? Yes that sounds as stupid as blaming any other product for crimes.

The citizens actually get along with the cartels. The cartels only go after the authorities and politicians that started hounding them when Bush Jr started their war on drugs. In fact, there is quite a peaceful city, open for tourism, that is completely run by cartels. No law enforcement. The name escapes me, though.

[–] 1 pt

Id like to believe but i dont. Im not going to be turned into cartel stew or have my face put onto a soccer ball and kicked over the border. Not going to happen.

Here's a few videos on the Narco State in Mexico. I'm not saying it's safer than anywhere else, I'm saying the risk is the same as anywhere else.

This is the best one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTxgcZcgLbk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnw0dMBeq9c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYnl-Jd9Gfw

[–] 0 pt

Just to keep the record straight, Nixon, 'ol tricky Dick himself, started the War on Drugs. 1972 or so.

In the US, yes... Bush gave a grant to Mexico to kick start theirs.

[–] 2 pts

they should instead be suing the current fucking regime... it was under obummer's administration - which includes uncle joe and holder - to blame for the gross negligence and utter disregard that defined Operation Fast and Furious.

Actually Bush Jr gave them money to start a war on drugs.

[–] 2 pts

shit, good ol' 'im not a crook' nixon started that campaign, which every president thereafter just sunk more money in to keep everyone clueless that the US gov was the biggest mafioso in operation. send in our spec-ops to root out guerilla cartels, replace entire leadership that opposed us, just to take ownership and cash it in when no one was looking - just like pushing crack into the inner-cities in the 70s and 80s. gotta keep 'em drugged, hungry and scared for them to hang on the teet. notwithstanding our laws and subsequent punishment's are a fucking joke to those that are caught.

[–] 2 pts

Mexico sees a chance to win some money in the nigger lottery.

If the courts allow Mexico to sue us for building and selling products which are lawful, then the courts must allow us to sue Mexico for allowing, encouraging, helping their citizens - and those of other nations who cross thru Mexico - to illegally cross the border into the U.S. Given the huge number of already-and-still-crossing illegal aliens who have done and are still doing this, which case do you believe to be easier to prove?

[–] 1 pt

Here we go. Invasion soon to follow.

[–] 1 pt

Something something Obama arming cartels, fast and furious.

So lets sue Conagra over diabetes, sue Anheuser-Bush over alcoholism and DUI offenses, sue florists over allergic reactions, and sock manufacturer's over porn addiction.

All this is, is nothing more than propaganda to attack the 2A.

No one but white people should be allowed guns. It is our culture not their’s.