WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

659

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Who is this retard? The British crown split from the Catholic Church in 1534. They have not been aligned with the Catholic Church since then. And they have done this without dissolving the crown.

[–] -1 pt (edited )

No. Read the contract. Parliament cannot relieve the contract that binds the King. The king controls parliament, not the other way around.

I'm not arguing this. I live in Canada, I know this for certain. I live in one of their founded pedo towns.

Welcome to the real hell.

edit: looked it up, has nothing to do with King John's bind: "The Acts of Supremacy are two acts passed by the Parliament of England in the 16th century that established the English monarchs as the head of the Church of England." Nice try though.

[–] 1 pt

You do realise the Church of England is the Protestant church founded by Henry VIII yes? It is not in any way, shape or form affiliated with the Catholic Church. Are you also aware that the Protestant British crown implemented multiple laws to persecute Catholics in her realm? The British crown has nothing to do with the Catholic Church. You are just completely wrong.

[–] -1 pt (edited )

Trying SO HARD.

You do realise the Church of England is the Protestant church founded by Henry VIII yes?

So what? What does this have to do with the contract of 1213?

I'm not entertaining this. You can believe whatever you want, I'm so deep in the truth, it's all I breathe.

edit: look at Canada for more proof, but keep trying though, I know you need to cope. Here I'll help a little bit, "it's the jews", feel better now?