Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

764

(post is archived)

[–] • 10 pts

this seems to make israel out as the biggest victim. as if that could ever happen..... i smell a rat

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

greater israel but with a population six million lower

[–] • 0 pt

What said. More victim points, possibly setting themselves up as the only nation who meets the legal criteria necessary to successfully sue the company, and pass the cost on to literally every other country on Earth. Never underestimate an O's greed for shekels.

[–] • 6 pts

so the take-away is this country got $12 shot while other countries paid $19 a shot?

I mean. Who gives a fuck.

[–] • 5 pts

The point I think they're making is that this was about money and closed door deals. They don't want the supply to spoil hence forcing this on people.

[–] • 1 pt

You clearly didnt scroll through the contract highlights if thats your only takeaway.

[–] • 5 pts

It's often said that, it's a bad idea to mix politics and business, but what isn't stressed enough, is that it doesn't just apply to the private sector; business owners "going woke" for instance, losing the non woke market share as a result. It's also true for the public sector; politicians getting kickbacks for serving the interests of lobbying corporations, in an way or another.

It's either business or politics. You mix both you get the situation we have now.

From my point of view, you don't become a public sector employee to become a millionaire, it should be a given that your pay won't be extraordinary if you decide to go for a public sector job. That there should be downsides, limitations, such as you can't become general and then go work for boeing or raytheon, or even receive payments from any entity connected one way or the other to the said firms. Same deal for the director of the NIAID for instance. As a matter of fact, as a public servant, you should be barred from exercising any financial or commercial activity potentially involving a conflict of interest at one point or another.

I know it's horrible. Now of course you're free to pick a shovel and go work on a construction site to make a living, nobody forces you to become a public servant

Hm

Fuckers

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts
[–] • 2 pts

The JEW NEWS will not mention this one time ever

[–] • 1 pt

Does such a contract resemble closely enough a treaty such that Congress would have to approve it?

[–] • 1 pt

Seems like it where there is a requirement to preempt existing national law - I think regulation is the loophole. The approach here would be to issue whatever regulation is needed to cover these bases. A person could review recent Code of Federal Regulation changes in USA and then challenge this based on whether the regulatory change process was correctly followed and whether the regulation changes adhere to the law which empowers the regulator.

I imagine that muh pandemic emergency would be effectively used to defend rapid changes to health regulation without review and comment and other formalities normally required. However, if the law says that its purpose is to ensure access to safe and effective medications and the regulatory change permits the aquisition of untested or arguably unsafe/untested medication then the challenge could be to whether the regulation is reasonable given the law empowering the agency.

Of course, this is all so murky that normies would never understand and our compromised judiciary could rule in favor of Pfizer, CDC, et. all all the way through the supreme court giving no shits about the people harmed by this arrangement.

Edit: IANAL.

[–] • 1 pt

Pfizer may not be liable if that contract is upheld but that doesn’t mean the asshats who signed it on behalf of a country’s government can’t be held liable.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

posting a whole document like this page by page in a twitter thread is ridiculous

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah exactly. Although there is a link to the entire actual document it nearl all the down down the thread as a addon comment called KONTRATEN-E-PLOTE which translate to "Read the full contract".Link -

[–] • 0 pt

They should have just linked

[–] • 1 pt

It seems kind of like big news, but is really? Most people don't care unfortunately.

[–] • 1 pt

That's the unfortunate part. Wait till they realize the magnitude of their decision to take this poison

[–] • 1 pt

where is the mfr details? All I saw is a bunch of provisions to make sure they get paid. And the liability stuff we already know about.

[–] • 0 pt

There was alink I'll have to see if I can find it

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Memory hole check. Do people forget when South American countries didn't want to give Pfizer a no liability clause and they demanded their MILITARY BASES as collateral?

Load more (2 replies)