The problem with these companies is that their entire revenue model is based off printer cash, and you can NEVER beat the money printer to make revenue. So really, CNN, Netflix, whoever the fuck could tank tomorrow, be sued into oblivion, have zero subscribers, and still be solvent. Killing this beast is a bigger task than it seems
The sad fact is, NF is hugely popular. Even my very right-wing housemates watch it for the Bigfoot documentaries, while they moan about the majority SJW programming. They also smoke weed 24/7, which I bemoan as nigger behavior.
Believe it or not, you can use a utility and not let it program you via propaganda. I get it for free and watch once in a great while, mostly documentaries and nature shows. I very very rarely watch any new series or new movies since they all have an agenda.
I had it for a few years, there IS good shit, but you gotta dig deep, and click on stuff you don't know and give it a chance. But 'Cuties' was the last straw for me. AmazonPrime is getting worse, but since I order shit constantly it's worth it.
Plus, there are issues that this article completely dismisses but are relevant. Netflix does periodically lose millions of subscribers and then regains them. It’s not uncommon at all for them. This number might be higher than usual, but it’s nothing they can’t handle. They’ll get most of them back.
It’s yet another case of lazy journalism being plastered here. The writer himself mentions this periodic subscriber loss, but didn’t bother to dig into what the numbers normally look like and how quickly they rebound. Just how unusual is this number? Is it a lot higher? Only a little bit higher? Is it seasonal? Instead he just shrugs it off because he has a narrative.
“It could be this ... but trust me, it isn’t.”
You know, what we normally criticize leftists for doing.
There is no critical thinking left anywhere. Anywhere.
(post is archived)